Quote from Tums:
should the black volume also be increasing in the area "e"?
I wonder, because it led to CCC, so the volume does not need to be increasing?
Tums,
First off, nice illustration!
FWIW, I made an attempt at drawing in "theoretical" gaussians for what volume behavior I would expect to see based on your price action. I tried my best to line up the gaussian peaks to the relevent price action points of interest.
My assumptions are:
1) the dashed blue channel is the Forest
2) the thick channels are traverses within the Forest
3) the thin lines are traverses within the traverses
I would expect to see B2R's traverse the Forest, based on your price action. The B part pushes price to the LTL and the R part pushes price back to the RTL. My thick gaussians attempt to show this.
Within the traverses, I would expect to see a X2X at every traverse channel BO. I circled these in pink.
Before price went into CCC, price BO'd the RTL of the short traverse (non-dominant). In theory, I'd expect to see a B2B there. And a B2B is increasing black volume.
However, if you intended the price action to denote that price "walked out" of the RTL (CCC), then I would not expect to see increasing black volume at that point in time. In this sequence, decreasing black volume should take price back to the RTL and the following volume bars prolly wouldn't be that interesting.
Any feedback on this would be appreciated,
spooz