Quote from bundlemaker:
15:10 In a lateral (HVS) after a FTT of a pt3 up channel. So, price entered the lateral from above. Anticipating exit below.
I don't see the Price patterns during the time frame mentioned as an HVS or as a lateral. Volume (at least on my charts) isn't providing the oscillating Red and Black signature indicative of an HVS. I do see lateral
movement (Note the closes of the bars), but lateral
movement is not a lateral
formation. I
do see the whole area as one, rather large, Flat Bottom Pennant
formation. This FBP does then move into an FBO breakout on increasing volume (imagine that).
Quote from bundlemaker:
15:15 In early part of bar price was still in lateral. My eyes were glued to the DOM and watching for a wall on the offer. At 1461.50 I saw 27/478 bid/ask, and kept watching. In a blink, the wall disappeared and I reversed to long.
Now
this is exactly how one needs to monitor.
While monitoring the market, you believed you had received a market signal for an HVS / Lateral formation. Its immaterial, at this point, that you incorrectly (or correctly based on your own charts) 'viewed' the landscape with respect to being on the 'right' side of the market. As a result of your monitoring and analysis of the Price and Volume bars, You made a decision (Lateral) which led to a conclusion (continuation).
You then looked for confirmation or invalidation of your assertion / hypothesis using any number of tools. What did you find? The wall on the Ask (which first appears to confirm your hypothesis) suddenly disappears. You reverse to the Long side because you recognize the 'wall disappearance' as either 1. Wall Movement (a game played to sucker in the dumb money) or 2. Wall Elimination (the train is leaving the station; better jump on board)
Both situations provide a
change signal (based on your previous orientation (continuation to the down side) developed from your incorrect (or correct, based on your own charts) analysis of the Price and Volume Bars.
As a result, you correctly reversed not worrying about 'being right' about your correct (or incorrect as the case may be) original hypotheses.
Nicely done.
As you learned today, it does not matter if one makes an error at some point in the MADA Process. What's paramount to understanding the whole enchilada here is being able to recognize - in the NOW - what the market is telling you.
In bundlemaker's example, the market was relaying the message, "Dude, what are you on crack? Lateral formation? ROFL. Trader, please!" Fortunately, for this trade, bundlemaker did not concern himself with 'being right,' he focused only on understanding what signals the market handed out.
Again, nicely done.
- Spydertrader