If I may:
In my opinion it's not that important if "it touched". This method works even when you drew one channel incorrectly, and when you mislabeled an FTT, FBO, BO, flaw. It self-corrects almost immediately.
On the other hand, there is always some noise in the markets, both in price and volume, and the lines we draw and the annotations we make have a certain degree of flexibility (or incertitude, if you like).
You have to always keep in mind the bigger picture.
In my opinion it's not that important if "it touched". This method works even when you drew one channel incorrectly, and when you mislabeled an FTT, FBO, BO, flaw. It self-corrects almost immediately.
On the other hand, there is always some noise in the markets, both in price and volume, and the lines we draw and the annotations we make have a certain degree of flexibility (or incertitude, if you like).
You have to always keep in mind the bigger picture.
Quote from PointOne:
Many people have asked if the 10:10 bar was an FTT.
On my chart it looks like it touched if I use thick lines, not if I use thin. On others it looks like it missed by a tick. Who is right?
Looking at the strict geometry:
...
