Spydertrader's Jack Hershey Equities Journal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from Spydertrader:

As a result, I take no action with GMAI.
Viewing the attached chart makes me very happy I followed the rules on this particular signal and stayed away. GMAI might also prove the old saying, "buy the rumor, and sell the news."

- Spydertrader

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=684255>
 

Attachments

2005-02-10, Thursday - Lists

I used RS and EPS Settings of 90 for the following lists

Stocktables.com
Sevens - Ones - Zeros
ISRG - WCC - MIPS
USNA - WWCA - WLL
CUTR - CMC - MTEX
TRGL - NTAP - VPI
EZPW - CCJ - JOYG
FRD - SNDA - MRVL
STNR - HLIT - NGPS
VPI - ANGO - MEE
TOPT - ANTP - MFLX
------------- FLSH

Wealth-Lab Chartscript/Manual
Hotlist

ANTP
CUTR
NGPS
TRGL
ANGO
TOPT
MFLX
FRD
EZPW
MIPS
HLIT
SNDA

Wealth-Lab Data/Yahoo Data
Watch List

GOAM - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10
PACT - DU Cycle - DU5
TASR - DU Cycle
IDSA - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10
ELOS - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10
TOPT - DU Cycle - DU5
BCSI - DU Cycle - DU5
EBKR - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
COGT - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
CALM - DU Cycle
ESMC - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
HRT - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
ULBI - DU Cycle
IPXL - DU Cycle - DU5
ISSC - DU Cycle - DU5


Wealth-Lab Developer Data & Equations/G33M4K Equations
SRVZ Wealth Lab Equations - Dry Up (with G33M4K Score)

EBKR - 1

Eyeball
Gallas2 "Keep an Eye on These" Stocks

EXM (Attached)

Yahoo Data/G33M4K Equations
Dry Up Stocks with G33M4K Master List Score of Zero

PACT
TASR
BCSI
HRT
IPXL

Stocktables Sort/Yahoo Data/G33M4K Equations/
Test Culling Method with Score Hotlist

FFIV 0
ISSC 0
MFLX 0
SNDA 1
EXM 2
KEYW 2
MIPS 4
ELOS 5
TOPT 7

(GOAM, ANTP, NGPS, ANGO, HRT, IDSA, MT, HLIT, TRGL have float outside normal parameters)

The following Stocks have been ADDED to the Final Universe List as of 2005-02-07: TRGL.

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=684259>
 

Attachments

2005-02-10, Thursday - Update

Our system has generated several signals already this morning. Actual volume for ULBI exceeded caclulated Dry Up Volume early this morning, but the high volume failed to result in price appreciation. As a result, I took no action with regards to ULBI. Also, actual volume for BCSI exceeded the calculated 25% pro-rata volume just before 10:00 AM. Although BCSI showed price improvement ($12.85), MACD (-.0037) and The Stochastic Indicator (13.3337) fell outside our desired parameters. As a result, I did not trade BCSI either.

- Spydertrader
 
Quote from Spydertrader:

2005-02-10, Thursday - Update

Our system has generated several signals already this morning. Actual volume for ULBI exceeded caclulated Dry Up Volume early this morning, but the high volume failed to result in price appreciation. As a result, I took no action with regards to ULBI. Also, actual volume for BCSI exceeded the calculated 25% pro-rata volume just before 10:00 AM. Although BCSI showed price improvement ($12.85), MACD (-.0037) and The Stochastic Indicator (13.3337) fell outside our desired parameters. As a result, I did not trade BCSI either.

- Spydertrader

Are your indicator readings from the 30 min for BCSI?

Also, I find that negative macd histograms are fine for entry but negative macd lines indicate a down trend.

Thanks.
 
Quote from nwbprop:

Are your indicator readings from the 30 min for BCSI?

Also, I find that negative macd histograms are fine for entry but negative macd lines indicate a down trend.

Thanks.

Yes, the readings come from my 30 minute chart. However after posting, I have noticed some peculiar readings this morning comparing my data with the "Automated Dry Up Calculation" Web Page. As a result, I think it might be time for a new data provider. Too many inconsistencies lately. Thanks for the tip on the MACD. I use histogram as well, and need to look into your observations further. I appreciate the 'heads up.'

- Spydertrader
 
Quote from Spydertrader:

2005-02-10, Thursday - Update

Actual volume for ULBI exceeded caclulated Dry Up Volume early this morning, but the high volume failed to result in price appreciation.
- Spydertrader

Interestingly enough, I was able to short ULBI at 16.38 this morning, covered half around 15.55 shortly thereafter (dropped like a stone) and subsequently got shut out of my account as a potential pattern day trader because I'm a small fry and have less than 25k in my account. Grrr!! Really damn stupid rule if you ask me. Quite a restriction of freedom for non-fulltime traders, which I guess is the point of the rule, but it's killing me right now.

Anyhow now I'm running naked on this one hoping for the best today. Currently it's back up to 15.91 after having bounced up to 16.33, whew. Would have had a stop at breakeven or a few cents better but.... I can't.

Incidentally, the other 2 trades I made recently were both a 5% appreciation in one day using this method (albeit I use a slighty different culling method).

Those of you "real" traders with more than 25k, count your blessings! I will hopefully be there in a few months. Good luck to you all.

-JohnC99
 

Attachments

Quote from johnc99:

Incidentally, the other 2 trades I made recently were both a 5% appreciation in one day using this method (albeit I use a slightly different culling method).

Good to see you having success with The Hershey Methods. Feel free to share your techniques, so others may learn from your success.

- Spydertrader
 
2005-02-11, Friday - Lists

I used RS and EPS Settings of 90 for the following lists

Stocktables.com
Sevens - Ones - Zeros
CTSH - WWCA - MIPS
USNA - NGPS - MFLX
PMTI - SNDA - WLL
VPI - NTAP - VTIV
HANS - HLIT - TRGL
STNR - LCAV - MEE
LSS - UTHR - DTPI
ISRG - HOLX - CMC
ADBL - MDRX - ANTP
MT - FLSH

Wealth-Lab Chartscript/Manual
Hotlist

ANTP
NGPS
TRGL
MFLX
MIPS
ADBL
HLIT
SNDA
PMTI
HANS

Wealth-Lab Data/Yahoo Data
Watch List

GOAM - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10
PACT - DU Cycle - DU5
TASR - DU Cycle
KEYW - DU Cycle
INTN - DU Cycle
ELOS - DU Cycle - DU5
EBKR - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
COGT - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
ESMC - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
JUPM - DU Cycle
HRT - DU Cycle - DU5
IPXL - DU Cycle - DU5
ISSC - DU Cycle
CALM - DU Cycle
BLTI - DU Cycle

Wealth-Lab Developer Data & Equations/G33M4K Equations
SRVZ Wealth Lab Equations - Dry Up (with G33M4K Score)

EBKR - 0

Eyeball
Gallas2 "Keep an Eye on These" Stocks

EXM (Attached)

Yahoo Data/G33M4K Equations
Dry Up Stocks with G33M4K Master List Score of Zero

KEYW
EBKR
JUPM

Stocktables Sort/Yahoo Data/G33M4K Equations/
Test Culling Method with Score Hotlist

EXM 0
KEYW 0
MIPS 0
SNDA 0
ELOS 2
MFLX 2
ISSC 5
PMTI 6
TOPT 7

(GOAM, ANTP, NGPS, ANGO, HRT, IDSA, MT, HLIT, TRGL have float outside normal parameters)

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=684804>
 

Attachments

Quote from Spydertrader:

Good to see you having success with The Hershey Methods. Feel free to share your techniques, so others may learn from your success.

- Spydertrader

Sure no problem. I have a mentality of “never being able to leave well enough alone”, so based on the knowledge I've gained thus far from this incredible journal and reading through everything I could find on Hershey material elsewhere throughout the net (thanks for all the links), I've made a few changes in an effort to increase the frequency of trades and number of stocks in the final universe.

All the criteria I use for picking stocks are the same (float, eps, five 20% waves), but first I reduced the volume constraint to 150k using 3mo avg vol instead of 65day avg vol, (it’s just easier to swipe off yahoo finance). More importantly though, instead of using the 7/1/0's list, I just cull all the stocks meeting these criteria from the stocktables download list. I know Jack called this a "killer sort" and not to mess with it, but given my understanding of the scoring concept, this sort only made sense to me if you're using only these stocks each day to trade from. Given your success with building a "final universe" of ranked stocks, I decided to just focus on that. Also, I'm using 80eps/80rs with stocks from $5 to $50 on only Nasdaq stocks. Any stocks meeting the specified criteria go into the final universe. I use extreme caution with the $5-10 stocks; they go into a sublist of the universe.

For entry into a stock I've decided to use previous day volume, not calculated dry-up volume. The DU_Cycle calculation "qualifies" a stock for the daily watchlist, but I use pro-rata calculations of the previous day volume for entry. Although if a stock’s previous day volume is less than the DU20 calculation, I use DU20 instead. I got this idea from your g33m4k zero score alternate entry technique. It made sense to me when you talked about trouble with the "dry-up gap" and previous day volume probably being closer to the spirit of Jack's eyeball technique for DU calculation, so I decided to take it one step further. Have had great success with this method so far.

Another qualification I use for adding stocks to the daily watchlist is to see if a stock's volume is "close" to the DU_cycle calculation (and no higher than the 65day avg vol line). I will throw it onto a secondary watchlist only if the daily chart is setting up damn good, ie: volume contracting relative to past volume, pullback to trendline, good score, low stoch, etc. I use pro-rata previous day volume as the signal for entry on stocks in this list. Made some good trades off this list recently: TRGL long, VDSI long, RATE short, etc. Missed VDSI short and RATE long this morning though (see above post).

Also, for entry I’ve decided to use 50% pro-rata by 10:30am (along with your 30min MACD and stoch idea) as the signal to go long because I've seen 25% fail miserably on volume surges off the open. The 25% signal alerts me to get ready. Sometimes I'll go ahead and take it if things look really good and volume is pacing quickly. For shorts I try to use 25% because you have to get in fast. I might stop shorting stocks though because of how fast they drop, like today's ULBI debacle with the ridiculous pattern day trader rule.

Additionally, on the daily charts I draw trend channels (there was a great link someone provided earlier in the journal about this) and use a 5,3,3 stochastic as well as the g33m4k score and 50day MA for additional confirmation whether to go long/short a stock

During a trade I take half off at 5%, the rest at 10, move stop to BE or better after 1st half. I also try to use as tight a stop as I can, no more than 5%, usually 4, and move it up as aggressively as possible, placing it under swing lows if I can on the 30 min chart. I have a rule to never move a stop back down after trailing it up. Also, I never exit a trade arbitrarily, only the trailing stop or targets get me out. This is a mentality I've brought over from futures trading to keep from psyching myself out of an otherwise good trade. I’m sure my judgement will improve over time, like your experience with the recent ELOS trade. I had pulled off 5% on Friday, but then Monday I bailed out right after it gapped down in the morning, rather than waiting for it to come back and fill up the gap like you did. Awesome.

Anyhow, hope all this helps provide food for thought for this journal. Everyone, take it with a grain of salt, at this point I'm still just a small fry trader, who can't help but obsess over an already proven method and twist it around to 'make it his own'. I welcome comments, observations, etc.

Spydertrader, thanks for the invaluable contribution of knowledge you've provided in this journal, I look forward to continued reading and learning from your experience and others for some time to come. Good luck and good trading to all.

-Johnc99
 
Quote from johnc99:

Spydertrader, thanks for the invaluable contribution of knowledge you've provided in this journal, I look forward to continued reading and learning from your experience and others for some time to come.

Thank-you for your words of appreciation. However, as I have said many times, the real credit for the success of this journal belongs to individuals (such as yourself) that have freely shared their ideas and experience. The highly detailed trading plan you posted above incorporates numerous methods gleaned from within the journal, as well as, your own observations. Your post above contributes a great deal to our "collaborative iterative refinement" process, and I have no doubt, many will find your contributions helpful. I continue to encourage everyone to post their own contributions, ideas, observations and input allowing us all (in the words of Isaac Newton) "to see further by standing on the shoulders of giants."

Quote from Isaac Newton:

If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.

- Spydertrader
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top