Quote from dkm:
At what point is it possible to identify an FTT?
(a) do we wait for the break of the end of the bar?
(b) do we attempt to identify during the formation of the bar?
Option (a) is the clearest but will often lead to multiple small losses (whipsaw), particularly in the event of congestion or the occurrence of outside bars
Option (b) seems to be the preferred approach but without clear criteria to make the decision, correct identification is very difficult to do with any consistency. If my understanding is correct, clues should be gleaned from pro rata volume and the 2 min YM but the âah-haâ experience is yet to occur. With an intrabar decision I appreciate that the probability of correct identification is reduced but without clear criteria the decision becomes little more than a guess. I would be grateful for comments on how to resolve this dilemma.
Quote from dkm:
At what point is it possible to identify an FTT?
(a) do we wait for the break of the end of the bar?
(b) do we attempt to identify during the formation of the bar?
Quote from REB:
Would you explain a HVS, EW and an 8-Ball?
Quote from REB:
As I understand it two signals to trade (there may be others) are a FTT (Failure to Traverse) and a FBO (Failed Break Out). Is this correct?
Quote from REB:
On a 1-2-3 moving down, a FTT would be a failure of a leg to reach the 2 line. This would be a call for a long trade. Am I correct or incorrect here?
Quote from REB:
On a 1-2-3 moving down, a FBO would be a failure of a leg to breach the 1-3 line. This would be a call for a short trade. Am I correct or incorrect here?
Quote from restan:
does this describe the correct action? the difference in your universe and mine may be accounted for by the difference in our EPS.
Quote from belavia:
BTW, is your watchlist consisting of stocks booted out of your final universe for failing to keep up 5 cycles of 20%, or am I missing something?