Mo:
I chose PUT on the down side and CALLS on the upside simply to go after the OTM options for a better fill.
I have heard of the double Butterfly but I do not want to trade it that way. My goal is to harvest BABIES given the way the SPX moves around. I do not think I would open both at the same time since I would like to try it with my own analytical bias like I did here with the PUT FLY.
I will read those links to see if there is any insight I can get to play this. Thanks for the links.
I chose PUT on the down side and CALLS on the upside simply to go after the OTM options for a better fill.
I have heard of the double Butterfly but I do not want to trade it that way. My goal is to harvest BABIES given the way the SPX moves around. I do not think I would open both at the same time since I would like to try it with my own analytical bias like I did here with the PUT FLY.
I will read those links to see if there is any insight I can get to play this. Thanks for the links.
Quote from momoneythansens:
OK, got it. Had I taken 2 seconds to examine the strikes I probably would have realised that's what you meant. However, good to clarify for everyone's benefit.
Essentially we're talking about the double butterfly strategy if you add the CALL fly. If you're trading a European exercise product like SPX then it doesn't make any difference if you trade both as PUT flies or CALL flies or IRON etc.
For those reading that haven't followed this thread since the beginning, here are some notes by an ET member (forget who) on the double butterfly strategy (doesn't address with BABY fly trading):
http://www.kaininito.com/options/articles/2005-11-01.html
Also some general discussion on butterflies at ToS that people might be interested in. Touches upon the double butterfly too:
http://mediaserver.thinkorswim.com/transcripts/unbalancedButterflies.pdf
MoMoney.

