Thanks mo, I think that was a better version of my point than my muddled version. Sorry Sailing for not being clear today, that picture of Jessica got me all googly moogly.
I should have said better to get more for less, i.e. 100 spreads v. 1000 spreads when OX or TOS charge $1.25 per contract ($2.50 per contract roundtrip. So 1000 spreads is a better deal for OX and ToS than 100 SPX spreads but not for me necessarily. I still prefer SPX.
Again, the wide b/a spread is a downer and you may prefer to use XSP for smaller positions and I can understand. But with my volume, I think SPX is better despite the wide spreads.
I should have said better to get more for less, i.e. 100 spreads v. 1000 spreads when OX or TOS charge $1.25 per contract ($2.50 per contract roundtrip. So 1000 spreads is a better deal for OX and ToS than 100 SPX spreads but not for me necessarily. I still prefer SPX.
Again, the wide b/a spread is a downer and you may prefer to use XSP for smaller positions and I can understand. But with my volume, I think SPX is better despite the wide spreads.
Quote from momoneythansens:
Okay I lied, one last post:
Not quite:
100 SPX Spreads for $4000 (ROM: 4%)
1000 XSP Spreads for $5000 (ROM: 5%)
Figure 1$ per contract commissions:
One Way:
100 SPX Spreads for $3800 (ROM: 3.8%)
1000 XSP Spreads for $3000 (ROM: 3%)
Round-trip (for closing/adjusting)
100 SPX Spreads for $3600 (ROM: 3.6%)
1000 XSP Spreads for $1000 (ROM: 1%)
Commissions really are a killer when trading spreads that narrow. Return on margin net of commissions is probably a better apples to apples comparison IMHO.
MoMoney.

