Quote from falconview:
Trading Journal and Cache Landing
It is after midnight and I am just reading the last couple of blurbs of my lessons. This doesn't seem like option 101 anymore. It more feels like software engineering classes.
I'm glad Trading Journal qualified it, with this "will come over TIME". Ha! Ha! Ha!
a) I've got the SHORT STRADDLE to fully understand?
b) The TIME SPREAD to understand
c) The two EDGES or so, of Cache Landing. Not so much the EDGES but the relationship between them and how you apply them.
Being a simple country yokel, I kinda have to get one thing down good, before going to the next.
Let me ask this? For Trading Journal
What is the best moment in TIME, or index movement to place a Short Straddle? From the conversation on here, I'm getting the feeling that a pause, or reversal of trend? Won't know until I try it a few more times, I can see.
I see you mentioning reversals and also reading the current level of Volatility from the option chain. That is giving me some ideas.
I was thinking a reversal will give you an altering situation in a SHORT STRADDLE, in that TIME DECAY or THETA will occur in whichever is OTM. The volatility will collapse premium of the side going to go ITM. I sort of am trying to catch a cloud of smoke here. In essence I'm going to get a profit by declining premium on whichever goes OTM and also going to get a premium advantage by collapsing volatility. Then I can buy back. It is however a fleeting seemingly moment to grasp that profit?
I'm not going to progress to the TIME SPREAD yet, until I understand the profit angle of this SHORT STRADDLE properly for ACTION and application.
My intitial thought was you watch the total credit you collected, when you sold the two CALLS and PUTS at the bid Then you watch the premiums of the ASK prices to see when they differ and are LESS in total than what you sold them for and buy them back. I vaguely understand that the TIME DECAY, or THETA will help and the collapse of Volatility of the premium collapsing will also help to achieve this profit goal. It is the question of TIMING.
Thinking about the cost of the difference in BID and ASK or market maker cost doesn't seem productive, when I'm really looking to see the TOTAL of the two sold options at the BID are greater than the two totals of the ASK. The difference is when I can buy them back and show a profit and clear my expenses. There has to be a moment in the movement of the index when this occurs? What is it?
From your chat I get the impression this is just at a reversal of index movement? I will figure it out of course by trial and error, but it would be faster if you just said so. Or described your moment in the TIMING of the INDEX for placing the SHORT STRADDLE. I will check that Volatility as well of the premiums and see what they tell me in identifying the moment in TIME when I should be BUYING BACK to make my profit.
Now I feel like STANFORD as a dog worrying a bone! ( grin! )
I understand the profit of the SHORT STRADDLE is about the effect of TIME DECAY, or THETA and of VOLATILITY of collapsing premiums. At least I think I do?
Interesting stuff, definitely not Options 101.
Falconview:
1. Let me give an anology. Imagine an car insurance company. The best situation for a car company is that they sell insurances to all cars at a given moment, and one second later all the cars are not driven at all end expiration plus one second. Think about it again.
The equivalent of it in the stock market is that the stock market does not move, while time moving. Selling a straddle is insuring against both a rise in price, and a decline in price. Your best scenario is that nothing happens, and you wait until the end.
2. The market timing models are not about the options, they are about timing the stocks. As I wrote before I included them to say that I believe I have an edge in direction, but the other problems may damage an edge, and that those problems are the trader. Review the post in which I discuss this aspect.
3. When I read your posts, I got some statement that you indicate you understand something important. At the same time other statement, written in your wording, put doubts on whether you fully understood.
4. With respect to what I see, it is not something that I can describe it in the sense you seem to think it is. It is an analysis, and not an ABC type of thing. It can be taught, but like other things it needs time, effort, and other things.
5. It seems to me that you are fighting with the BID/ASK spread. One can reduce the cost of the bid/ask spread, but the money comes from time, and correct analysis of underlying and strategy development and implementation.
(This post is not edited as I am in a hurry-- again).