Well it is Friday morning and I'm watching my OEX weekly spread I put on yesterday for .10 cents. There are three possibilities I think? Either the market will go sideways and I will win late this afternoon. Or the market will go down and I will win this afternoon. Or the market will go up and I will possibly be threatened. If I have to close if threatened, I only would like it to happen after the noon hour, when all the TIME DECAY that will be taken out of the premiums has been rung out. I might still lose if I close it, but not by much I think? Won't know until it happens.
*********************
I was thinking this early morning hours about the MONTHLY versus the WEEKLY trading. It is true you get 4 trades a month in the weeklies. Whereas you only get ONE trade in the monthlies. In the weeklies I try normally to trade not less than .30 cents premium. Though this THURSDAY - FRIDAY system I'm trying right now is somewhat different. Because occasionally you can turn a Vertical Spread into an IRON CONDOR. The second side of the IRON CONDOR is free of margin reserve requirements, so essentially you get two trades for the same $25,000 in my case. Only one side could lose.
That said; I had read somewhere that for the long haul in CREDIT SPREAD trading, you need to get more than .60 cents of premium credit. Far as I can tell in the last 12 weeks of trading, you do not get that doing weekly trades. I usually get .30 to .45 cents. Mostly .30 cents of the four trades per month. Which equates to $1.20 a month premium credit. The drawback as I can think of it, is more trades increases your probability of suffering a loss. So while you might average $1.20 a month, the RISK would be higher on weekly trading due to the larger number of trades needed. Unless you could develop a sure thing bet, more or less, or one that if failing would be very small and not expensive in lost margin, because of the size of the bet needed to make it worthwhile. Hence my now trying the Thursday - Friday trade in a weekly.
The higher risk due to more weekly type trades, makes the NDX look good. Or I suppose any MONTHLY index? For the most part I am discounting the so called VOLATILITY and wider range advantages of strikes, as while the NDX is appearing to be more volatile, in fact the chart is looking at a quick glance to mirror the OEX. What is happening is the volatility experienced is because the NDX is trading roughly 9 points to every 5 points in the OEX. I think if you thought of it in terms of PERCENTAGE CHANGE, you would find the premium price action exactly the same roughly. As also the movement. What seems to me briefly looking at it, is that the NDX is sort of magnified, as in a ZOOM picture of what is a more condensed picture of the action in the OEX. There are more points to trade and perhaps you can trade the smaller magnified swings in the NDX, than you would for instance in the OEX. Don't know if this is true, but it seems to be to me, at a brief glance so far. 3 points flutter, or noise in the OEX would be about 27 to 30 point move in the NDX.
What I'm going to come back to is the fact that somebody said, which I read sometime, that .60 cents is needed or better to make money over a couple of losses in the long haul. Obviously trading any monthly, either OEX or NDX would give you a better premium further out options. It is possible then I think, that the NDX would be better to trade one monthly trade with a better premium of $1.20 if you can get it, from a long haul profit view point, as less trades would mean less RISK. So comparing the WEEKLY trading versus the MONTHLY trading, if you can get a premium with over .60 cents and in looking at it, I can see $1 premium at 180 points out the money in the NDX, then the one trade a month would be a better trade than four weekly expiration trades at .30 cents, because fewer trades equates with LESS RISK.
I'm just thinking out loud with my fingertips here and if any experienced, successful long term credit spread traders on here have any criticisms of this line of thinking, please fire away. I am after all a novice and trying to learn the intuitional nuances.
In summation, what I am thinking is it is less risk to trade a monthly one time, than a weekly four times a month. Though if winning you may make more. It seems from my first rough check, that you can get a $1 premium and by technically TIMING your buying get far enough out in the NDX to make a winning trade. This winning trade would lessen your risk and be over the .60- cents somebody said someplace on the internet you need to make money after 2 losses a year.
Comments welcome and if the thinking is faulty, please point it out?
*********************
I was thinking this early morning hours about the MONTHLY versus the WEEKLY trading. It is true you get 4 trades a month in the weeklies. Whereas you only get ONE trade in the monthlies. In the weeklies I try normally to trade not less than .30 cents premium. Though this THURSDAY - FRIDAY system I'm trying right now is somewhat different. Because occasionally you can turn a Vertical Spread into an IRON CONDOR. The second side of the IRON CONDOR is free of margin reserve requirements, so essentially you get two trades for the same $25,000 in my case. Only one side could lose.
That said; I had read somewhere that for the long haul in CREDIT SPREAD trading, you need to get more than .60 cents of premium credit. Far as I can tell in the last 12 weeks of trading, you do not get that doing weekly trades. I usually get .30 to .45 cents. Mostly .30 cents of the four trades per month. Which equates to $1.20 a month premium credit. The drawback as I can think of it, is more trades increases your probability of suffering a loss. So while you might average $1.20 a month, the RISK would be higher on weekly trading due to the larger number of trades needed. Unless you could develop a sure thing bet, more or less, or one that if failing would be very small and not expensive in lost margin, because of the size of the bet needed to make it worthwhile. Hence my now trying the Thursday - Friday trade in a weekly.
The higher risk due to more weekly type trades, makes the NDX look good. Or I suppose any MONTHLY index? For the most part I am discounting the so called VOLATILITY and wider range advantages of strikes, as while the NDX is appearing to be more volatile, in fact the chart is looking at a quick glance to mirror the OEX. What is happening is the volatility experienced is because the NDX is trading roughly 9 points to every 5 points in the OEX. I think if you thought of it in terms of PERCENTAGE CHANGE, you would find the premium price action exactly the same roughly. As also the movement. What seems to me briefly looking at it, is that the NDX is sort of magnified, as in a ZOOM picture of what is a more condensed picture of the action in the OEX. There are more points to trade and perhaps you can trade the smaller magnified swings in the NDX, than you would for instance in the OEX. Don't know if this is true, but it seems to be to me, at a brief glance so far. 3 points flutter, or noise in the OEX would be about 27 to 30 point move in the NDX.
What I'm going to come back to is the fact that somebody said, which I read sometime, that .60 cents is needed or better to make money over a couple of losses in the long haul. Obviously trading any monthly, either OEX or NDX would give you a better premium further out options. It is possible then I think, that the NDX would be better to trade one monthly trade with a better premium of $1.20 if you can get it, from a long haul profit view point, as less trades would mean less RISK. So comparing the WEEKLY trading versus the MONTHLY trading, if you can get a premium with over .60 cents and in looking at it, I can see $1 premium at 180 points out the money in the NDX, then the one trade a month would be a better trade than four weekly expiration trades at .30 cents, because fewer trades equates with LESS RISK.
I'm just thinking out loud with my fingertips here and if any experienced, successful long term credit spread traders on here have any criticisms of this line of thinking, please fire away. I am after all a novice and trying to learn the intuitional nuances.
In summation, what I am thinking is it is less risk to trade a monthly one time, than a weekly four times a month. Though if winning you may make more. It seems from my first rough check, that you can get a $1 premium and by technically TIMING your buying get far enough out in the NDX to make a winning trade. This winning trade would lessen your risk and be over the .60- cents somebody said someplace on the internet you need to make money after 2 losses a year.
Comments welcome and if the thinking is faulty, please point it out?