Quote from segv:
I think this will be very illustrative.
Assuming the SPX is at 1385, what is the $risk of holding one short 1385 combo versus owning a $equivalent amount of SPY at -1/2/3 sigma? Which position would you prefer to own and why?
-segv
Well segv, you are the only person on here who has given me an example to work with. Jeffm apparently did not want to self incriminate himself. LOL. Smart move on his part actually.
Selling the ATM combo is a hard delta bet. You are basically long half the equivalent underlying position. This position will outperform the SPY position with the same number of contracts all the way down and underperform it all the way up.
The difference will present itself more clearly if we adjust for margin. In other words, if we sell the same marginable amount of combos as to the SPY shares.
Now we are talking a completely different story as the combo will provide considerable more risk. So let's use real world numbers shall we?
Let's say we bought 1,000 shares of SPY at the current closing price of 138.58 for a margin of 69k. Now let's construct a position that has a similar margin amount using the SPX options. BTW, SPX is more restrictive then ES options which uses Span margin, which I will also compare.
Long 1000 SPY (margin 69K) at 1215.00 = 17k loss
short 2 SPX ATM DEC straddles (55k margin) at 1215.00 =27k loss
Short 4 ATM DEC ES straddles ( 69k) span margin at 1215.00 =136k loss!!!!!
These are using real numbers folks. So what is the point to this demonstration. If we compare the risk of owning the underlying to the naked option position with the SAME margin, you can get an idea of how the risk gets leveraged substantially on a selloff.
The best position to own in this example would be the long 1000 SPY. It carries the largest upside vs the risk taken.