Quote from dagnyt:
Because of negtve gamma, when you sold your futures, you were already short deltas. Selling just made you shorter. That's doubling the risk.
If you were really 'scalping negative gamma' you would have bought even more futures (to get delta neutral again), not sold the ones you bought earlier.
Short gamma scalping you buy rallies and sell dips.
That's not what you did.
Your 22 spreads may have been the driving force behind the futures purchase, but they had nothing to do with the sale. You just decided to get even shorter and arbitrarily assign the profits from the futures trade to your 22 spreads.
Mark
I totally get your point now, except for one thing:
I'm not scalping short gamma and I arbitrarily assigned the profits to the spreads. But how am I getting shorter as compared to not having done the scalp at all?
If I had not done the scalp (bought and then sold), my deltas would have been exactly the same at the point where I sold the futures. This drives home your point of this being an independent transaction, but I don't understand how it increases the risk as compared to not having done the scalp.
It is obvious that no matter how you slice it, I'm better after booking the profits from the scalp. But also I'm fooling myself of thinking that my short deltas are offsetting the loses from them. In reality, any loses from the scalps will come out from profits from the scalps and the spreads themselves will behave exactly as if the scalps never happened.
