Yes, of course, you are right.
As I think about it, I was probably thinking back to an earlier post on the topic and it probably was with regards to double diagonals. I believe the idea was that if you put on a call diagonal for a credit, then most likely the "equivalent" put diagonal would be for a debit. Equivalency here means the same months, the same number of contracts and the same spread between long and short strikes.
EDIT: Also, probably this assumed following the general guidelines about being OTM and risk management that are generally practiced here. I suppose you could always come up with some combination where both would give a credit.
As I think about it, I was probably thinking back to an earlier post on the topic and it probably was with regards to double diagonals. I believe the idea was that if you put on a call diagonal for a credit, then most likely the "equivalent" put diagonal would be for a debit. Equivalency here means the same months, the same number of contracts and the same spread between long and short strikes.
EDIT: Also, probably this assumed following the general guidelines about being OTM and risk management that are generally practiced here. I suppose you could always come up with some combination where both would give a credit.
Quote from dagnyt:
Any diagonal - put or call - can be put on for a credit. Obviously, the amount of credit (or debit) depends on the distance between the strikes.
Mark
