I believe you are thinking of the posts he has made on ratio diagonals.
Just imagine for a regular diagonal you were short the AUG1340P and long the SEP1320P with a debit of 1 point. Go look at today's prices for that spread. (For those reading this later...its about 20 points)
Now what if you were short 10 of the AUG1340P, and long 12 of the 1320P. Your initial debit would have been higher, but now check out the total position value.
Just for grins, since we're talking about black swan protection, look at the prices for a plain-jane calendar. Short AUG1340, long SEP1340. (Again for the lurkers...the spread is about 2 points).
I'm not advocating any of these trades as better or worse initially. But 100 points ITM, there is certainly a clear winner. If only we could forsee a 100 point move...
Quote from rdemyan:
Hmmm. I seem to remember Murray saying that these diagonals give you black swan protection vis-a-vis a credit spread.
BTW: What do you mean by "barring a failure of the financial system"??
I mean that I'm not Nostradamus. Hell, I'm not even Jimmy the Greek

If your black swan turns into a black elephant, who can say what the results might be?
Its all probability versus risk/reward.
Chance of an asteroid hitting us is tiny, but the risk/reward is inversly terrible.
Chance of getting killed in a car wreck on the way to the grocery is pretty small. If you only look at risk/reward...is the gallon of milk worth gambling with your life? Some people do see it that way, and are afraid to leave the house. Other people are the quarterback of the Steelers and ride their motorcycle without a helmet.
Everyone has to work with a risk/reward and %win/loss that they are comfortable with.