Quote from optioncoach:
On the first spread (1130/1110) the mid is around $1.10 and with a wide b/a for the spread you might not get filled right away only shaving a dime. I see no rush to dive in today so leave the order there and see if it gets filled. If you need to get in today then you might need to take off another $0.10 to $0.20 at the most to get filled perhaps. However, let it sit today and see what happens.
Same with the second spread. The mid is around $1.50 or so and you are a dime off the mid in a very wide b/a spread. Let it sit but if you need to get in, take off another 10 or 20 cents.
Orders just off the mid have a lower chance of getting filled, but if you are patient and let it sit, the odds are, as long as the market has not swung to far away, you might eventually get a hit. I have let orders sit for hours to get filled since I was not trying to time the entry so perfectly. I had room to sit back and see if I get a fill. You can start shaving off a dime and re submit the order and wait and after a long time shave another dime to see if you get hit. The goal is not to get impatient.
Thanks Coach. The second spread (1130/1100) has been filled. This is my first trade with credit spread strategy inspired by this forum.
Return on risk = 1.4/(30 - 1.4) = 4.9%
I have used naked puts a lot when my Monte Carlo Simulation shows a positive return for naked writes. However, with credit spreads, it seems to me that the expectancy is always negative. So I am using a different rationale for credit spread trades.
Here are my reasons:
1. My short leg is more than 100 pts.
2. 1130 is lower than the low of 2005. There are many support zone in between.
3. the market is currently oversold, so I am selling now to take advantage of it.
I have many net short puts and calls in both IWM, OIH, VLO etc. It seems that I have doing too many underlyings. Is it true that it is better to focus on just only product? Or is it better to diversify into many products?
.