
Quote from kotika:
Hi all,
i am puzzled a bit by the mentions of the skew helping the selling of put spreads...
put credit spread is when you sell a put at some strike and then buy a put at a lower strike, right?
this, or the ratio variation on this is what most people here are doing right? You collect a small (or not so small credit) and hope that you dont get hit for the full difference of the strikes if s**t hit the fan.
so how does the skew help you? you are buying the put with the higher iv, no?
K
Quote from optioncoach:
SPX puts have higher IV the mroe OTM they go. Therefore, the deep OTM puts have higher IVs than the ATM puts. This lets you go pretty far OTM and still get decent premium since the IV is higher. Calls on SPX workthe opposite. IV drops as you go OTM so premiums start to dry up quicker.
Therefore, the SPX skew in puts lets you choose further OTM strikes than you would be able to if vols were constant across all strikes. We are not talking about the skew between the long and short strike, but the skew between the ATM and OTM puts![]()
Quote from Cache Landing:
It should be mentioned that you only get a better credit right now for the put spreads if you are more than about 1.7sigmas OTM. At about 1.7sigmas OTM the credits are about even. As you get nearer ATM there is a huge advantage in selling call spreads. As you get further OTM there is a huge advantage in selling put spreads. That is why the skew topic is referred to frequently on this thread. OC manages his strategy very well without getting greedy or vengeful, thus he can stay >2sigmas OTM and take advantage of the vol skew on the put side.
Just thought that was worth mentioning as it seems that many people think the skew ALWAYS makes the put credits better than the call credits.
Quote from Cache Landing:
As you get nearer ATM there is a huge advantage in selling call spreads.
Quote from snoobler:
IMHO, for SPX spreads, that thing is junk. It works purely off assumptions of where fills might occur mid vs. nat. It's nothing like the TPC. I would love to see the TPC functionality solved for price rather than value.
I second that. I was very excited when they announced it but practically it hasn't made much difference. Except that I probably have "lowered" my expectations more than I actually needed too![]()
Quote from cdowis:
This is my first experience with a diagonal spread rather than a iron condor, so have no firm idea on what to do with the remaining longs.
My first impression is to liquidate and start all over again.
Thanks
Quote from optioncoach:
SPX puts have higher IV the mroe OTM they go. Therefore, the deep OTM puts have higher IVs than the ATM puts. This lets you go pretty far OTM and still get decent premium since the IV is higher. Calls on SPX workthe opposite. IV drops as you go OTM so premiums start to dry up quicker.
Therefore, the SPX skew in puts lets you choose further OTM strikes than you would be able to if vols were constant across all strikes. We are not talking about the skew between the long and short strike, but the skew between the ATM and OTM puts![]()