
Quote from momoneythansens:
You have to use your imagination when deciphering 'arb speak. Riskarb squeezes a lot of information into very few words = knowledge compression and high efficiency.
A (long) fly is short body, long wings.
A (long) time fly is short body (near month), long wings (back month)
a.k.a straddle/strangle swap which is a subset of the double diagonal class.
A short front month strangle and a long back month outer strangle is also a double diagonal or following on from the time fly nomenclature it could be called a time condor????![]()
All good!
[ADDENDUM: Each diagonal can be dissected as a vertical and a calendar and thus behaves exactly as if you had both the corresponding vertical and the calendar positions! It all makes sense really]
Half the battle in any industry/domain is the jargon.
MoMoney.
Quote from optioncoach:
I did not close the spread actually. I started shorting futures going into the close and we bounced off a pivot point support in the after hours and floated higher so I pulled them off and just went with my gut that we would be flat to slightly higher at the open on Friday with lack of news and people needing to digest the past few days events. Also no one wanting to take on major posiitons before the weekend.
I tried to be cute and scalp a little in the prop account on the 1250/1255 spread when the market was near 1320 or so. It was just out of my comfort zone and not in my normal trading nature and I almost had to eat a nice loss. Well it is a mistake I really would rather not make again.
So I will be putting a POST-IT on my computer with "1250/1255" written on it to remind me of what could happen if I try to get cute and sneak some premium out of the market. We were up to flat in the opening 30 minutes so far, so SET will definitely not be 6 points lower than the opening.
Let my almost mistake be a lesson to all LOL...
Quote from rdemyan:
Hey Mo:
I just started reading riskarb's new journal. Ugggh!
What's it gonna cost me to have you translate![]()
Quote from optioncoach:
Meantime I opened a new Diagonal:
SOLD 18 JUNE SPX 1310 Calls @ $3.60 ($6,480)
BTO 20 JULY SPX 1350 Calls @ $2.95 ($5,900)
Net Credit = $580
It seems to me there is an inherent prolem with call diagonals that is absent when using puts.
IV drops when the market rallies towards the short strike (obviously ideal if expiration is near). That seriously reduces the value of the July long calls.
When using puts, if the market declines towards the strike, there is usually an accompanying increase in IV, lifting the value of the long puts.
Do you take this IV factor into consideration when opening diagonal spreads? Do you find put diagonals to be moe profitable than call diagonals?
Mark
Quote from riskarb:
Diagonals, time flies, whatever... are what y'all should be trading. Rolling into positions from 6 weeks, until you're at full allocation with 4 weeks out. Scalping against your delta position is actually a tenable position close to expiration, unlike these penny-verticals. JMHO.
innit?
Quote from dagnyt:
Quote from optioncoach:
Meantime I opened a new Diagonal:
SOLD 18 JUNE SPX 1310 Calls @ $3.60 ($6,480)
BTO 20 JULY SPX 1350 Calls @ $2.95 ($5,900)
Net Credit = $580
It seems to me there is an inherent prolem with call diagonals that is absent when using puts.
IV drops when the market rallies towards the short strike (obviously ideal if expiration is near). That seriously reduces the value of the July long calls.
When using puts, if the market declines towards the strike, there is usually an accompanying increase in IV, lifting the value of the long puts.
Do you take this IV factor into consideration when opening diagonal spreads? Do you find put diagonals to be moe profitable than call diagonals?
Mark
We pointed this out a while back. Unfortunately the put skew makes this trade almost impossible on the put side.
Quote from skanan:
Do you scalp against the delta using stocks or future or what ?