Quote from CashCache:
I'm going to the TOS Advanced Options workshop in Chicago on 5/31 - 6/3. Anyone else going then?
SPX Positions for May so far:
May 1365/1375 Call Spread - 8% on margin
May 1220/1230 Put Spread - 6% on margin
May 1350/1355 Call Spread - 6% on margin
-Cash
Quote from CashCache:
I'm going to the TOS Advanced Options workshop in Chicago on 5/31 - 6/3. Anyone else going then?
SPX Positions for May so far:
May 1365/1375 Call Spread - 8% on margin
May 1220/1230 Put Spread - 6% on margin
May 1350/1355 Call Spread - 6% on margin
-Cash

Quote from ryank:
Rally,
What I think you are driving at is that your relatively close to the money spreads are less risky because you bring in more premium with less dollars at risk. If/when your position is threatened, you roll to a new position with more contracts (kind of a Martingale type of adjustment in a way I guess). This type of adjustment can put you around breakeven or even small profit if all works well for the month given a max loss of $2 per $5 spread as you claim in a recent post (I hope I'm not misrepresenting what you said). Given that you are closer to the money, aren't the chances of getting whipshawed while making adjustments somewhat good?
I've been modeling some spreads similar to what you have been talking about (a May 1275/1280/1335/1340 IC) and assuming a max loss of $2 on one side and then making an adjustment. It looks reasonable that one could take in a good credit while using less margin. I guess the test for me would be to see what happens when one of your shorts (or longs) is hit and you adjust, then I can see if things work out as they are being described.
I've got that nagging feeling I'm missing something so please don't flame me if I am. Just point it out and I will go back and crunch the numbers some more.
ryan

Quote from Cache Landing:
I think this is what is hoped for to make the VIX hedge successful.When it comes down to it, any fairly quick but steady, sustained move in either direction; the ones that are hurt the least are those of us who place our spreads closer to the underlying. Is that one of the reasons you like to trade the closer strikes?
unless you have proof that a spike to 30 in the VIX will not cause any movement at all of significance in MAY 15 calls.Quote from ryank:
Given that you are closer to the money, aren't the chances of getting whipshawed while making adjustments somewhat good?
Really, I have no clue if i will be whipsawed.Quote from ryank:
Rally,
This type of adjustment can put you around breakeven or even small profit if all works well for the month given a max loss of $2 per $5 spread as you claim in a recent post (I hope I'm not misrepresenting what you said).
I've been modeling some spreads similar to what you have been talking about (a May 1275/1280/1335/1340 IC) and assuming a max loss of $2 on one side and then making an adjustment.
Quote from momoneythansens:
it appears that VIX options for hedging a black swan event are about as useful as:
...
- A chocolate teaspoon.
- A solar-powered telescope.
- A screen door on a submarine.
- Herpes.
Quote from rallymode:
Well the chances of getting whipsawed arent any better than the chances of the spread going against you the minute you open it.Really, I have no clue if i will be whipsawed.
However, i look forward to getting whipsawed as it actually helps my strategy rather than hurt it as is the case with a FOTM spread.