Quote from yip1997:
I understand the dynamic replication, and so risk-neural valuation process, and it should use risk-free interest if deriving from this perspective.
However if you assume a pure brownian process, you should use the mean return if solved from this perspective. In reality, we use the standard deviation of stock return for sigma. Why don't we use the statistical mean of stock return for u.
Why can't we have free lunch statistically?
Quote from der_kommissar:
Nah, I just know your an inexperienced bullshit artist. Guys like you come and go all the time. Emotionally euphoric on your wins and despondent on your losses. You've left your little trail all over this thread.
Uglyboy - interesting. But I missed the article attachment. Can you post it?Quote from uglyboy:
Here's another idea...
Steve Lenz and co published a study in Option Traders Mag about using ATM iron butterflies as a delta neutral +theta strategy. They demonstrated good results (around +25-30% pa). The interesting thig is that they didn't use volatility as a screen. I've attached the article
A butterfly is really just a condor - I wonder about putting these on as an income strategy when IV is up. And of course diagonals when it's down.
The problem obviously is what is up and what is down!
Ugly
