wow, both these gentleman had ample opportunity to respond....nothing...makloda you are correct...
Quote from nonlinear5:
So, if I were Mr. Market, my evil plan would be:
1. Within the next few days, break through SPX 1400.
2. Let the "longers" joing the party. That would lift SPX to about 1450 in the course of the next few days after the break above 1400.
3. Sell off to 1330 by end of May.
4. A big time rally to above all time highs by year end.
Quote from jeffalvinson:
You can see from this long term 10 year chart of the S&P500, once the 40 week moving average bearishly crosses under the 80 week moving average, the 40wma becomes overhead resistance and it usually continues as overhead resistance for 1 to 2 years.
You can look back for a couple of decades and find this to be reasonably accurate.
Quote from frank grimes:
2 of the 4 horseman run around here, but NEITHER will answer any of my questions...Those who can PEE in a big stadium, those who can't.....post 20+ times a day on et....enough said
Quote from jeffalvinson:
You can see from this long term 10 year chart of the S&P500, once the 40 week moving average bearishly crosses under the 80 week moving average, the 40wma becomes overhead resistance and it usually continues as overhead resistance for 1 to 2 years.
You can look back for a couple of decades and find this to be reasonably accurate.
Quote from Landis82:
Makloda is indeed correct.
It is the single most significant reason that ET has become a website with absurd content that borders on the level of what is seen on a Yahoo Finance Message Board.
One "cut and paste" post after another by the resident ET guru's such as S2007S as well as others who haven't even taken an Econ. 1 class but have a much better "understanding" of the banking system's woes than Fed Chairman Bernanke.
Just a bunch of college kids down in South Florida playing on the Internet and getting "paid" per post.
Why else would a thread be kept "alive" by the mods and owner of this website for 35 pages in the TRADING FORUM that was created by some guy who believed himself to be Paul Tudor Jones, but clearly wasn't?
![]()

Quote from BlackBison:
good analysis OP, almost identical to mine. except i was looking for a fake up tp 1420-1430 (lol luckily todays figures pushed it right there so i fell like a genuis haha). perfect spot for a squeeze.