i would not have published the statement if I wasn't positive that Advantage could verify the account profit under subpoena.
Go ahead and get one of your buddies to provide an opinion.
My mom is already on the record.
i would not have published the statement if I wasn't positive that Advantage could verify the account profit under subpoena.
Go ahead and get one of your buddies to provide an opinion.
The email was forwarded to stereo70. He can do with it as he pleases as long as there is no boilerplate on the email strictly forbidding it's dissemination. Even then, there is no cause.
No he can't, shit-for-brains. Once again, you are the arbiter of all things if if someone disagrees with you they are automatically wrong. And you have no problems telling Baron to pack sand, apparently.
Patrick is in direct violation of Term 4 of our Contract Intellectual Use and Custody Agreement. This includes the retransmission or publication of any information or content provided by the Consultant to the Client in any manner without the express written consent of the Client.
Convexx, since there was an existing Privacy agreement in place regarding my emails to clients, there was an implied copyright protection in place and you are in direct violation of Title 17 of the United States Code Chapter 5. You could get hit for actual damages, or in some cases statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringement.