I wasn't quite sure were to put this, but since some options guys here know how to math, I figured the options subforum was best for this. I thought about posting this to the eggheads at willmot and nuclearphynance, but wanted to have a practical solution 
Currently I'm dealing with quite an interesting challenge: How on earth do I hedge the non-linearity of an inverse futures spread.
Let me explain.
A normal spread trade is long product A/short product B. Both have the same tick value and are denominated in the same currency. Tick value is static. So you can express the entire trade as A-B= Spread and your P/L is Spread(sold)-Spread(bought) x Tick value x size. Linear=simple.
Inverse futures follow a 1/x function and are not linear. Like for example if you trade an EUR/USD - CFD with a bucketshop and they denominate the P/L in Euro instead of USD or BitMEX' XBTUSD, which is quoted in USD but settled in XBT.
Because their Tick value is not static, the P/L calc is -(1/Selling price - 1/buying price) x size x current underlying price (when you want to peg the trade against the USD)
This means, your spread P/L calculus is this:
(-(1/selling price Leg1 - 1/buying price Leg1)-(1/selling price Leg2-1/selling price Leg2)) x size x current underlying price
The characteristics of this beast are quite interesting.
A change in the spread price generates deltas and amplifies convexity depending on the underlying price.
Picture worth more more than thousand words (Spread price is z axis from -200 to 200, x axis is underlying price, y axis is P/L)
As you can see, it's pretty nasty to trade this thing. If you're on the wrong side, you get your balls kicked twice. However, I like it a lot since I could not find anything about them, which means there's a lot of edge to be had plus you can gamma scalp the upside
Has anybody an idea on how to isolate the spread price and hedge changes in the underlying?
I mean it kinda looks like a split strike synthetic that gets more gamma with negative underlying returns instead of lower vol.
At the moment I hedge when I feel like I need to, but I'd love to just do a lock, stay away from the screen and let it ride.
Input is appreciated...could also be that I'm wrong somewhere in my asumptions.
Rgds,
Muppet

Currently I'm dealing with quite an interesting challenge: How on earth do I hedge the non-linearity of an inverse futures spread.
Let me explain.
A normal spread trade is long product A/short product B. Both have the same tick value and are denominated in the same currency. Tick value is static. So you can express the entire trade as A-B= Spread and your P/L is Spread(sold)-Spread(bought) x Tick value x size. Linear=simple.
Inverse futures follow a 1/x function and are not linear. Like for example if you trade an EUR/USD - CFD with a bucketshop and they denominate the P/L in Euro instead of USD or BitMEX' XBTUSD, which is quoted in USD but settled in XBT.
Because their Tick value is not static, the P/L calc is -(1/Selling price - 1/buying price) x size x current underlying price (when you want to peg the trade against the USD)
This means, your spread P/L calculus is this:
(-(1/selling price Leg1 - 1/buying price Leg1)-(1/selling price Leg2-1/selling price Leg2)) x size x current underlying price
The characteristics of this beast are quite interesting.
A change in the spread price generates deltas and amplifies convexity depending on the underlying price.
Picture worth more more than thousand words (Spread price is z axis from -200 to 200, x axis is underlying price, y axis is P/L)
As you can see, it's pretty nasty to trade this thing. If you're on the wrong side, you get your balls kicked twice. However, I like it a lot since I could not find anything about them, which means there's a lot of edge to be had plus you can gamma scalp the upside

Has anybody an idea on how to isolate the spread price and hedge changes in the underlying?
I mean it kinda looks like a split strike synthetic that gets more gamma with negative underlying returns instead of lower vol.
At the moment I hedge when I feel like I need to, but I'd love to just do a lock, stay away from the screen and let it ride.
Input is appreciated...could also be that I'm wrong somewhere in my asumptions.
Rgds,
Muppet
