I think I spotted an error in how TastyTrade interprets the situation in the following reality 
https://support.tastyworks.com/support/solutions/articles/43000435231-good-faith-violation-gfv-
The error is with the first entry on Tuesday: they say "XYZ Call purchase settles". But this is IMO incorrect, because the purchase was already using settled cash (ie. UnsettledCash=$0 on Monday), so there is nothing further to settle in this case. The rest of the picture is correct.
And: IMO only sales generate "unsettled cash", not buys.
See also https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/trading-investing/trading/avoiding-cash-trading-violations

https://support.tastyworks.com/support/solutions/articles/43000435231-good-faith-violation-gfv-
The error is with the first entry on Tuesday: they say "XYZ Call purchase settles". But this is IMO incorrect, because the purchase was already using settled cash (ie. UnsettledCash=$0 on Monday), so there is nothing further to settle in this case. The rest of the picture is correct.
And: IMO only sales generate "unsettled cash", not buys.
See also https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/trading-investing/trading/avoiding-cash-trading-violations
Last edited:
