Trump makes G.W. Bush sound articulate.
Speculations over Trump's dementia surface...
- Thread starter Cuddles
- Start date
Trump makes G.W. Bush sound articulate.
That could be said about praticaly any leftist being confronted by logic... Would they all be considered candidates for dementia diagnosis? As a physician I can say: "No, they're just stupid."
And I don't even like Trump...
I remember you, you really can't afford to lose any working synapses at all as your acetylcholine levels are way low. Around early late 20s or early 30s judging by your stupid? You might start tDCS, you could build your own kit from Youtube videos.
Get a load of this great thinker:
Actually, "the Christian theory of rule by the meek" is just another illusion for the meek to justify their stealing from the ones who aren't meek and actually produce wealth in the world.
The problem is that, as sheep that consider a pastor essential to rule them, they don't realize that the pastor actually uses them to make a living and even get wealthy.
That's why the most unequal societies in history had the biggest governments. These societies were also extremely violent, killing literaly millions of people(Nazism and Communism being great examples of this).
But sheep being sheep, will always think that a pastor is a solution to all their problems, just because the pastor says it is so, regardless of how many sheep they see slaughtered or sold by the pastor. This way they can continue to be mindless and irresponsabile beings.
Really? I have no idea who you are, nor do I care to know it...
Wow... A lefty whose only form of response is a personal attack making an absurd assumption on my acetylcholine levels, conveniently ignoring the subject... What else is new?
The fact I mentioned still holds: it's just absurd to try to say that someone has dementia because of "rants" or even "fury attacks"... Even if these are symptoms that people with dementia show before the diagnosis, nobody will use them as criteria without other clearer symptoms(with or without family history), because by doing this, you'd have to consider the diagnosis to almost every adult human being in the planet. That being said, the assumption being discussed is completely idiotic.
I see why Tom B likes you haha, lots in common.
Actual disease doesn’t give a damn about ethical debate. I had a taxi driver last year who was driving dangerously in my opinion, I got out without a even a medical diagnosis and got another cab. Can you imagine that?
We cannot get another planet after he in say a fit of paranoia two years along the line plays with the football prematurely in a real or imagined crisis. You can view this as a partisan attack however it did not come out of nowhere. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation...esidents-ability-to-authorize-nuclear-weapons
Your point is flat out wrong as on suspicion alone we send people in high-risk jobs for medical examinations to assess physical and mental fitness. Your "you'd have to consider the diagnosis to almost every adult human being in the planet." is not well thought out.
Pilots had to retire at 60 until 2009 (now 65) and the number of lives they can risk is relatively tiny. Invoking the 25th amendment in mental health circumstances may be unprecedented (discussed in Reagan's time) but it provides a legal, non-coup way to remove him.
He may be on a stabilizing drug now or his scan may be clean as a whistle. We need to know which it is as Trump is not a relatively trustworthy man like Reagan was.
Actual disease doesn’t give a damn about ethical debate. I had a taxi driver last year who was driving dangerously in my opinion, I got out without a even a medical diagnosis and got another cab. Can you imagine that?
We cannot get another planet after he in say a fit of paranoia two years along the line plays with the football prematurely in a real or imagined crisis. You can view this as a partisan attack however it did not come out of nowhere. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation...esidents-ability-to-authorize-nuclear-weapons
Your point is flat out wrong as on suspicion alone we send people in high-risk jobs for medical examinations to assess physical and mental fitness. Your "you'd have to consider the diagnosis to almost every adult human being in the planet." is not well thought out.
Pilots had to retire at 60 until 2009 (now 65) and the number of lives they can risk is relatively tiny. Invoking the 25th amendment in mental health circumstances may be unprecedented (discussed in Reagan's time) but it provides a legal, non-coup way to remove him.
He may be on a stabilizing drug now or his scan may be clean as a whistle. We need to know which it is as Trump is not a relatively trustworthy man like Reagan was.
Last edited:
Hey--quick demonstration of how ignorant Liberals and Democrats are:
I see this all the time where they think the 25th amendment should be invoked as a way to get rid of Trump without impeaching. er hehe. The 25th amendment takes 2/3rds of the House and 2/3rds of the Senate to agree to remove the President. Furthermore, it takes the Vice President to get things started AH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Impeachment only takes a simple majority of the House to impeach and 2/3rds of Senators present to convict. It is much easier to impeach and convict than to invoke the 25th amendment. ----The left is so uninformed that it is mind-blowing.
It makes for a good headline and story for the liberal media.
That’s all that matters. Facts and Truth be damned.
Goebels would be proud.
This is like talking to the Marx brothers. Thats a lot of Hahas there. I read the whole thing (25th) several times a while back. And it has been commented on many times also.
The amendment states that if, for whatever reason, the vice president and a majority of sitting Cabinet secretaries decide that the president is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office,” they can simply put that down in writing and send it to two people — the speaker of the House and the Senate’s president pro temp.
Then the vice president would immediately become “Acting President,” and take over all the president’s powers.
That seems pretty easy?
So typically after an illness the president might declare himself fit, or in Trump's case fight for control.
If he does this, he’ll get his powers back in four days — unless the vice president and at least eight Cabinet officials say, in writing, that he is still unable. Then the vice president will remain in charge for the time being, and Congress will have to step in to settle this dispute.
Congress will vote on whether the president is in fact “unable.” If two-thirds of both the House and Senate vote that he is, then the vice president will remain in charge as acting president.
If they fall short of that margin in either House, or simply fail to act within 21 days, the president will regain his powers.
Impeachment.. Under the constitution, the president, the vice president and other U.S. officials can be removed following impeachment and conviction for treason, bribery or other “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
Is mental illness a high crime @Buy1Sell2 ?
Care to comment @Clubber Lang ?
Last edited:
So you admit that Trump is not ill. ---er hehe
No. It's not easy at all. You missed the entire point which is that Morlibons are barking up the wrong tree with the 25th amendment. It is much easier to impeach and convict and you are demonstrating your ignorance and stupidity.
As hard as it is to believe, this concern is based whether the POTUS who could kill us all, is mentally sound. So impeachment is not appropriate in this discussion. If one can impeach for medical grounds please explain but I don't believe this path is valid.
I don't want to get him out by any means via dirty tricks. I have zero emotional involvement in stupid left/right teams.
As much as I loathe him as a human being and the awful example he is, any removal must be based on a factual reality.
Last edited: