Where did I say anything about a top .... or not a top.Let's make a bet. If today's high is the intermittent top, I win and you shall refrain from posting here for 1 month. But if I lose I shall do the same, deal?
Wrong. Plenty of stocks (not to mention ETFs) have gaps that get filled by traders. There's nothing magical about an index or circuit breaker. The bottom line is you have a bias and are trying to use TA to justify it.QQQ don't matter Jack when it comes to chart reading. It because QQQ not tied to the stock market interrupter (circuit breaker) but the SP500. So QQQ has no weight in anything where trading is concerned...
Wrong. Plenty of stocks (not to mention ETFs) have gaps that get filled by traders. There's nothing magical about an index or circuit breaker. The bottom line is you have a bias and are trying to use TA to justify it.
SPX (nor QQQ) is not a stock or ETF. It has no obligation to fill a gap at or above/below the EXACT high/low of said gap.
Nothing in the market has an obligation to do anything. Do you expect this 27-month old gap for the S&P 500 below 2550 to be filled, too (blue circled area)?
View attachment 289998
expect no, want yes
So you even HAVE a 401K? Why the hell do you want the market to plummet? Why does anyone? Yer killing people's retirement funds!
How about 4444 and not a tick higher or lower?SPX (nor QQQ) is not a stock or ETF. It has no obligation to fill a gap at or above/below the EXACT high/low of said gap.