You are splitting hairs here. Even if your point was true, and I don't believe it is. It absolutely does appear that those are government advisors and consultants, not the equivalent of parliament or congress. But even if they were, you named what? 2 living people within the thousands and thousands (millions?) of people who make up the Chinese government? Then you try to use that to make the point that China is a 'diverse' or 'multicultural' society by Western standards because of that? The fact that you are splitting hairs with this is a testament to the fact that you have no point. The fact that you had to edit your data to suit your point reinforces that fact.
Why not just address my points if you don't agree with them, instead of construing less than credible arguments as to why they are not valid.
What is the difference? Any upper house legislative body in the world, like the UK's house of lords "makes suggestions and advises" the government. It is however as I pointed out also, a legislative body which does deal with domestic policy not as the above poster suggested, made up of people who advise china on "how to deal with the west." That's ludicrous.
BEIJING, Oct. 21 (Xinhua) -- China's national political advisors Thursday offered suggestions on the national development plan for 2011 to 2015, at a meeting of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) in Beijing.
At the gathering, 15 CPPCC members made speeches in which they advised the government on issues such as improving education, adjusting income distribution, developing the western regions, enhancing China's innovative abilities and public welfare.
