SOTU - Global Warming is a FACT

No, proving CO2 causes global warming and that more of it causes more warming would not make anyone famous, asshole. Because it's an established fact. It's bedrock climate science. To deny it is fucking absurd and akin to saying up is down.


So again I ask. Which are you? Incredibly stupid or a fucking liar? I suspect both, but you can choose one if you want.



you are such a ignorant drone.
if you could prove adding more co2 to our environment causes warming you would be famous.

Notice there is not one scientist famous for proving that man made co2 causing warming. Its all guesses and speculation and failed computer models.

If you call me a liar again have the backbone to prove it you ignorant drone.
 
Its bedrock agw nutter... but it is speculation... it is not science.
I link to science... you spew bullshit and misdirection.

Here is science showing co2 lags change in ocean temps.
Get that numbskull... co2 is in sync but lags change in ocean temps... it is therefore very unlikely to drive temps.


1-s2-0-s0921818112001658-gr11.jpg


Abstract
Using data series on atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperatures we investigate the phase relation (leads/lags) between these for the period January 1980 to December 2011. Ice cores show atmospheric CO2 variations to lag behind atmospheric temperature changes on a century to millennium scale, but modern temperature is expected to lag changes in atmospheric CO2, as the atmospheric temperature increase since about 1975 generally is assumed to be caused by the modern increase in CO2. In our analysis we use eight well-known datasets: 1) globally averaged well-mixed marine boundary layer CO2 data, 2) HadCRUT3 surface air temperature data, 3) GISS surface air temperature data, 4) NCDC surface air temperature data, 5) HadSST2 sea surface data, 6) UAH lower troposphere temperature data series, 7) CDIAC data on release of anthropogene CO2, and 8) GWP data on volcanic eruptions. Annual cycles are present in all datasets except 7) and 8), and to remove the influence of these we analyze 12-month averaged data. We find a high degree of co-variation between all data series except 7) and 8), but with changes in CO2 always lagging changes in temperature. The maximum positive correlation between CO2 and temperature is found for CO2 lagging 11–12 months in relation to global sea surface temperature, 9.5–10 months to global surface air temperature, and about 9 months to global lower troposphere temperature. The correlation between changes in ocean temperatures and atmospheric CO2 is high, but do not explain all observed changes.
 
Your brain is speculation. You wouldn't know bedrock science if it broke your fucking douchey nose you fucking liar.

Yes CO2 is greenhouse gas, that's a fact. The higher the level the higher the temp ,that's a fact. Bedrock proved simple science. You lying douchebag. Either that or you're an idiot. Which is it?

Or maybe you're just an asshole.


Its bedrock agw nutter... but it is speculation... it is not science.
I link to science... you spew bullshit and misdirection.

Here is science showing co2 lags change in ocean temps.
Get that numbskull... co2 is in sync but lags change in ocean temps... it is therefore very unlikely to drive temps.


1-s2-0-s0921818112001658-gr11.jpg


Abstract
Using data series on atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperatures we investigate the phase relation (leads/lags) between these for the period January 1980 to December 2011. Ice cores show atmospheric CO2 variations to lag behind atmospheric temperature changes on a century to millennium scale, but modern temperature is expected to lag changes in atmospheric CO2, as the atmospheric temperature increase since about 1975 generally is assumed to be caused by the modern increase in CO2. In our analysis we use eight well-known datasets: 1) globally averaged well-mixed marine boundary layer CO2 data, 2) HadCRUT3 surface air temperature data, 3) GISS surface air temperature data, 4) NCDC surface air temperature data, 5) HadSST2 sea surface data, 6) UAH lower troposphere temperature data series, 7) CDIAC data on release of anthropogene CO2, and 8) GWP data on volcanic eruptions. Annual cycles are present in all datasets except 7) and 8), and to remove the influence of these we analyze 12-month averaged data. We find a high degree of co-variation between all data series except 7) and 8), but with changes in CO2 always lagging changes in temperature. The maximum positive correlation between CO2 and temperature is found for CO2 lagging 11
 
BTW, It's pointless to show you the science because you just ignore it and play dumb because you are a fucked-up douchebag.

Shit, you still don't even know what a greenhouse gas is. You're so fucking stupid that you think it cools the lower atmosphere. That's pretty fucking dumb.
 
A professor at Northwester University told me that oil companies are real nice to him and subtly, they try to manipulate him into saying things to obsfuscate the connection between human carbon consumption and human forced Global Warming.

This is not new:

"Billion-Dollar-A-Year Program To Deceive Public About Global Warming Is Exposed"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-zuesse/billiondollarayear-progra_b_4513944.html

FutureCurrent, you are wasting your time. These people are probably on the payroll.
 
A professor at Northwester University told me that oil companies are real nice to him and subtly, they try to manipulate him into saying things to obsfuscate the connection between human carbon consumption and human forced Global Warming.

This is not new:

"Billion-Dollar-A-Year Program To Deceive Public About Global Warming Is Exposed"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-zuesse/billiondollarayear-progra_b_4513944.html

FutureCurrent, you are wasting your time. These people are probably on the payroll.

Sometimes I wonder. It's a fact that the right wing think tanks have folks like jem and gwb out on the forums trying to confuse people.
 
Back
Top