So out of the 2000 papers less than 2% explicitly state support for AGW. The other 98% either do not mention AGW or explicitly deny it exists.
It's time to bring out the 97% Retarded Parrot again!
SOTU - Global Warming is a FACT
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
I have facts and all you have gwb is lies and cartoons. You're a pathetic piece of shit liar.
No cartoon will change the fact that multiple reviews of climate science papers and surveys of those scientists show that the consensus is 97%.
But asshole like you don't beleive in science or facts, just cartoons and lies from frauds that make you feel better.
Deal with it. You are fucking wrong asshole.
No cartoon will change the fact that multiple reviews of climate science papers and surveys of those scientists show that the consensus is 97%.
But asshole like you don't beleive in science or facts, just cartoons and lies from frauds that make you feel better.
Deal with it. You are fucking wrong asshole.
FC, we have provided endless papers from respected scientists, graphs of raw data, and definitive proof that the assertions you post are wrong. Tragically you are stuck on political dogma and unwilling to consider the perspectives of people who have studied global warming in more detail than you. There is no 97% consensus - it is disturbing to think that anyone could actually believe there is a 97% consensus on an evolving scientific subject that is in no way proven. In the same way, claims about a 97% consensus on a political topic is a fraud, as is a dictator winning 97% of the vote.
Sadly FC you are
A 2010 paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States (PNAS) reviewed publication and citation data for 1,372 climate researchers and drew the following two conclusions:
(i) 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Anthropogenic Climate Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.[118]
A 2013 paper in Environmental Research Letters reviewed 11,944 abstracts of scientific papers, finding 4,014 which discussed the cause of recent global warming and reporting:
Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.[119]
Additionally, the authors of the studies were invited to categorise their own research papers, of which 1,381 discussed the cause of recent global warming, and:
Among self-rated papers expressing a position on AGW, 97.2% endorsed the consensus.
(i) 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Anthropogenic Climate Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.[118]
A 2013 paper in Environmental Research Letters reviewed 11,944 abstracts of scientific papers, finding 4,014 which discussed the cause of recent global warming and reporting:
Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.[119]
Additionally, the authors of the studies were invited to categorise their own research papers, of which 1,381 discussed the cause of recent global warming, and:
Among self-rated papers expressing a position on AGW, 97.2% endorsed the consensus.
notice the troll has not produced any of the papers requested below.
why? I will explain why. the author of that study provided a database with the names of the papers he surveyed.
If you read the titles you will see... very few (far less than 5% of the sample I reviewed) of them have the potential to deal with whether man made co2 causes warming.
FC is a troll liar... he cares not a bit for the truth.
why? I will explain why. the author of that study provided a database with the names of the papers he surveyed.
If you read the titles you will see... very few (far less than 5% of the sample I reviewed) of them have the potential to deal with whether man made co2 causes warming.
FC is a troll liar... he cares not a bit for the truth.
notice the troll has not produced any of the papers requested below.
why? I will explain why. the author of that study provided a database with the names of the papers he surveyed.
If you read the titles you will see... very few (far less than 5% of the sample I reviewed) of them have the potential to deal with whether man made co2 causes warming.
FC is a troll liar... he cares not a bit for the truth.
I find it to be quite comical that ET's troll of 2013 would fathom breathing the word troll to another member here!
Jem you piece of shit lying troll. Just because you are fucking blind, stupid and a liar it changes nothing about what I presented which BTW is just copied from authoritative sources.
If you were in front of me I would punch you in your fucking douchebag face for calling me a liar. Liar. Eat shit and die.
Can you read douchebag?
Additionally, the authors of the studies were invited to categorise their own research papers, of which 1,381 discussed the cause of recent global warming, and:
Among self-rated papers expressing a position on AGW, 97.2% endorsed the consensus.
I find it to be quite comical that ET's troll of 2013 would fathom breathing the word troll to another member here!
Don't we just love being accused of shit nowadays... envirobastards think of humans as a virus and Mother Earth as the victimized host. They will not stand for mankind managing and using earth's resources, instead they want to force us all into cities and let the forests burn of their own accord. These people are actually insane and evidently insane people can garner a lot of political support via activism.