On the plus side, he did ask for forgiveness in the thread title.I’m confused: you aren’t looking to get into a discussion because of the “pro/anti” and then you spend 22 pages posting “anti.”
Were you looking for a safe space?
On the plus side, he did ask for forgiveness in the thread title.I’m confused: you aren’t looking to get into a discussion because of the “pro/anti” and then you spend 22 pages posting “anti.”
Were you looking for a safe space?
I’m confused: you aren’t looking to get into a discussion because of the “pro/anti” and then you spend 22 pages posting “anti.”
Were you looking for a safe space?
Is there something wrong with posting articles without being required to argue my position?
Sure, I feel the vax is doing more harm than good but IMO there's not enough information being spread amongst the general population due to the banning/restrictions put on anyone that has a negative opinion of the vax. Most doctors/nurses fear talking or they'll lose their jobs. FOOLISH to silence the most knowledgeable people yet that's exactly what our corrupt government is doing.
You can post your opinion all you want just don't expect me to get into a never-ending argument about it. This topic is as toxic as politics (Dem/Rep). Social media is full of pissing matches which I prefer to avoid.
I just think its funny you don't want to discuss the topic but then post hundreds of articles about the topic. What's the point?

Try reading my post again. I think you missed my point.![]()
you are only posting one side. So it is a pissing match but you are the only one in the ring (on a trading site no less).
Post all the pro-vax you want.
Is it a requirement that I argue my point? My articles state my point on their own.
Am I not allowed to post information without a pissing match?