Quote from Debaser82:
Does anyone knows why Soros and Rogers don't like each other anymore?
They were friends no?
Neither of them like to talk about that period anymore.
Someone should interview both about their time together and put it into a book.
It would be a huge seller.
Really, jem? Discoverthenetworks.org? The initiative funded by the David Horowitz Freedom Center, formerly the Center for the Study of Popular Culture?
Quote from Gabfly1:
Really, jem? Discoverthenetworks.org? The initiative funded by the David Horowitz Freedom Center, formerly the Center for the Study of Popular Culture?
Chip Berlet specializes in the study of right-wing movements in the United States, particularly the religious right, white supremacists, homophobic groups, and paramilitary organizations. Writing for the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), an organization devoted to "combat racism and promote civil rights through research, education and litigation," Berlet identified the CSPC (now DHFC) as one of 17 "right-wing foundations and think tanks support[ing] efforts to make bigoted and discredited ideas respectable."
I bet you didn't even read Soros's own words, did you, jem? Rather, you resorted to the comfort of being told what to think and write by turning to a source that sees the world through your own ideological prism. Oh, how very surprising.
Afraid to read his own words and then draw your own conclusions, aren't you? I started my last post by telling you to do your own chewing and swallowing. Instead, you got discoverthenetworks to do your chewing for you.
Really? Then I apologize for suggesting that you did not read his piece. Could please identify where his words are inconsistent with his actions?Quote from jem:
I did read soros words and they are inconsistent with his actions and his funding.
I don't judge people by their words... I judge them by their actions.
Quote from Gabfly1:
Really? Then I apologize for suggesting that you did not read his piece. Could please identify where his words are inconsistent with his actions?
Depends on whether the messenger has a propensity to corrupt the information. Once the messenger goes loosely-goosey on the information, then he is no longer a messenger. He is a propagandist. I would have thought you to be somewhat more discerning.Quote from jem:
...Why combat the information or the actions when you can slander the messenger?
Quote from Gabfly1:
Depends on whether the messenger has a propensity to corrupt the information. Once the messenger goes loosely-goosey on the information, then he is no longer a messenger. He is a propagandist. I would have thought you to be somewhat more discerning.