You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Soro's panicks
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
Nonsense.Glad you made that non point for us Piezoe.
How about the important one. Soros is funding cronies and astro turf groups to keep the cronies in power so they can keep doing the things the people don't want them to do. For instance mass immigration.
Soro's own definition makes it manifest Soros is an evil bastard who supports closed societies run by cronies.
Of course. I am a libertarian through and through. I want my liberties, but I am not stupid like the folks who swallow lock stock and barrel infowars' nonsense. Generalized liberty without good government is impossible.Spoken like a true liberal.
Last edited:
Just listen to your language, Jem. Read aloud the stuff you have written. You are well meaning, but becoming more and more irrational.what the heck are you talking about... Fredie?
The establishment right is owned by the cronies also. Dems and the Establishment right are working together stealing our freedom and destroying our standard of living every day.
The left does not deliver single payer the right does not deliver low taxes and low spending. Both sides deliver the worst of the left and the right.
We get the worst of the right and the worst of the left because of Soros and Steyer types on the left and the Kochs and friends on the right.
There have been no heros for the people of the USA in a long time.
You're babbling. You are not making sense.Soros says...
"I distinguished between two kinds of political regimes: those in which people elected their leaders, who were then supposed to look after the interests of the electorate, and others where the rulers sought to manipulate their subjects to serve the rulers’ interests. Under Popper’s influence, I called the first kind of society open, the second, closed."
---
Read the words "manipulate their subjects to serve the rulers’ interests."
So here is the test. Are you in favor of mass immigration even though some of the immigrants are terrorists? whose will is this serving the crony rulers or the subjects?
Do you support soros as he pays for groups which attempt to manipulate the citizens of the U.S.
Do you support politicians who favor open borders and receive money from Cronies like Soros.
If you answered yes to the above you support closed societies per Soro's own words.
I would add Soros and those who support manipulating societies to support Soros' interests are evil bastards.
You are so out of touch with reality, it's not funny.Just listen to your language, Jem. Read aloud the stuff you have written. You are well meaning, but becoming more and more irrational.
Read this:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/20/hillary-clinton-embraces-george-soros-radical-visi/
It's all come out in the wikileaks. George Soros wants global government. George Soros wants open borders. George Soros wants to do away with Nation-States. This is all on the public record.
You are confused. This is not the "Washington Post" you quote, it is theYou are so out of touch with reality, it's not funny.
Read this:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/20/hillary-clinton-embraces-george-soros-radical-visi/
It's all come out in the wikileaks. George Soros wants global government. George Soros wants open borders. George Soros wants to do away with Nation-States. This is all on the public record.
"Washington Times." You are living in an age when anyone can manipulate words out of context for their own purpose. Don't be stupid. Soros is strongly antiwar, and a believer in international cooperation. If you are pro-war and a nationalist, then say so. You are starting to make Jack Hershey look sane.
Last edited:
The Washington Times is more credible than the Washington Post, you ignorant fool.You are confused. This is not the "Washington Post" you quote, it is the
"Washington Times." You are living in an age when anyone can manipulate words out of context for their own purpose. Don't be stupid. Soros is strongly antiwar, and a believer in international cooperation. If you are pro-war and a nationalist, then say so. You are starting to make Jack Hershey look sane.
You are confused. This is not the "Washington Post" you quote, it is the
"Washington Times." You are living in an age when anyone can manipulate words out of context for their own purpose. Don't be stupid. Soros is strongly antiwar, and a believer in international cooperation. If you are pro-war and a nationalist, then say so. You are starting to make Jack Hershey look sane.
Trump is neither pro-war or an isolationist. Is this what Liberals do all day? Sit at home and invent straw men ? Then call me stupid? When you can't even grasp the political landscape? Soros is all that and much more. He admittedly collaborated with the Nazi's to get his own Jews enslaved/killed, and had NO REMORSE for it. Openly. Best time of his life. Remember that one, big guy? Soros is pro World War Three with Russia. Pro Mass Muslim Invasion. Pro Race War in America financing Black Lives Matter @33 million USD. By "international cooperation", you mean Soros wants Global Government and ending the national sovereignty of America and putting it under United Nation Rule.
Piezoe you are as libertarian as barrack obama
do libertarians support this?
do closed or open societies do this....
"In yet another video, Gruber says the Obama administration knew the individual mandate was a tax, but that if Americans knew the truth “the bill dies.” So the bill “was written in a tortured way to make sure [the Congressional Budget Office] did not score the mandate as taxes.” He adds that “the lack of transparency is a huge political advantage” and that “the stupidity of the American voter . . . was really, really critical for the thing to pass.”"
President Obama insists none of this represents the views of his administration. Asked in Australia whether he had intentionally misled the American people to get the law passed, Obama replied curtly, “No, I did not.”
Yes, he did. Put aside his now infamous lie of the year in 2013 that “if you like your health plan, you can keep your health plan.” Obama also insisted repeatedly that the individual mandate “is absolutely not a tax increase.” In a 2009 interview with ABC News, George Stephanopoulos pressed him on it no less than five times. He even read Obama the definition of “tax” from Webster’s dictionary. Obama was adamant: “My critics say everything is a tax increase. . . . I absolutely reject that notion.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...6bd390a3340_story.html?utm_term=.1fe54fa51765
do libertarians support this?
do closed or open societies do this....
"In yet another video, Gruber says the Obama administration knew the individual mandate was a tax, but that if Americans knew the truth “the bill dies.” So the bill “was written in a tortured way to make sure [the Congressional Budget Office] did not score the mandate as taxes.” He adds that “the lack of transparency is a huge political advantage” and that “the stupidity of the American voter . . . was really, really critical for the thing to pass.”"
President Obama insists none of this represents the views of his administration. Asked in Australia whether he had intentionally misled the American people to get the law passed, Obama replied curtly, “No, I did not.”
Yes, he did. Put aside his now infamous lie of the year in 2013 that “if you like your health plan, you can keep your health plan.” Obama also insisted repeatedly that the individual mandate “is absolutely not a tax increase.” In a 2009 interview with ABC News, George Stephanopoulos pressed him on it no less than five times. He even read Obama the definition of “tax” from Webster’s dictionary. Obama was adamant: “My critics say everything is a tax increase. . . . I absolutely reject that notion.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...6bd390a3340_story.html?utm_term=.1fe54fa51765
Last edited: