Sony Case Sets Troubling Precedent

For those who have been in a cave the last few weeks, Sony was going to release a movie that had as its premise two morons are sent to North Korea ostensibly to interview the leader but really to assassinate him.

For some reason, the North Koreans took umbrage and unlike the countless other groups mocked, insulted or offended by hollywood, they are thought to have taken action. They mounted a horrendus cyber attack that laid bare all of Sony Entertainment's corporate secrets, including embarrassing emails that will inevitably cost the CEO her job. Not content with that, threats were then made that there would be terrorist attacks on movie theaters showing the film. The theater operators and Sony quickly folded, announcing the film would not be released.

While there is some grim satisfaction at seeing Hollywood liberals humiliated, the consequences are troubling. Muslims were already immune from media criticism for the simple reason that no one likes having a guy sneak up on you and hit you in the head with a hatchet. Criticize muslims and that is a real possibility.

Now we have gone beyond terror groups to actual state actors making such threats and carrying out destructive cyber attacks. The silence of our own government is also disturbing. One would have thought a mild comeback, such as a threat of utter and total nuclear destruction if so much as a firecracker went off in a movie theater, was warranted. Instead, nothing.

Of course, this is the genius administration that thought it would be a good idea to get into a new cold war with Russia. After all, Putin was unfriendly to gays at the Olympics, so obviously he poses a direct threat to us. I wonder if there are any hackers in russia who might be itching to one-up the North Koreans? Maybe take out our electric grid or shut down the banking system?
 
"One would have thought a mild comeback, such as a threat of utter and total nuclear destruction if so much as a firecracker went off in a movie theater, was warranted. Instead, nothing."

All those who are happy AAA is not in charge of anything, raise your hand.
 
critics who reviewed the movie said it was pretty bad. Now it is famous and one day will be shown on Turner Classic Movies with commentary on the controversial history. By then, North Koreans will order a pizza from Pizza Hut and watch it on Direct TV. It's only a matter of time.
 
critics who reviewed the movie said it was pretty bad. Now it is famous and one day will be shown on Turner Classic Movies with commentary on the controversial history. By then, North Koreans will order a pizza from Pizza Hut and watch it on Direct TV. It's only a matter of time.
Sony should post the movie to youtube and let the world have it.
 
It does set a troubling precedent, but I don't expect the Hollywod elites to take this lying down. Now you're messing with "their" money. I imagine some calls have already been made to dear Leader Obama.
 
As usual the ET rightwing clown car sees something happen and get it assbackwards. Here's what happened: an arrogant and foolish Hollywood corporation which has nothing to do with liberalism decides to make a stupid so-called comedy that slaps the face of a living ruthless dictator in order to make a profit -- not art, not a political statement, just another crass grab at profits by hitting at a target that is presumed to be safe to hit. Surprise! The presumed easy target finds a way to place his boot between the legs of the arrogant prigs at Sony and make them squeal like little piggies. It almost makes NK admirable for once. Almost.

The bottom line: everybody has heard the expression Don't Poke the Bear. But every now and then some fool goes and does it. When said fool gets his head torn off, does it make sense to get mad at the bear or reason that what happened to the fool was just evolution in action?

When you pick a fight with even a seemingly weak opponent, make sure your pants aren't around your ankles. Sony picked a fight while having a weak, easily breachble IT department and they've learned the consequences of being both arrogant and stupid. When North Korea attacks our national security network or our financial system or our power grid, I'll join the call to nuke them. But when they bitchslap an arrogant entertainment company that picked a fight for no sane reason, I just sit back and laugh.
 
Last edited:
don't forget, Sony is a Japan company, so this is not between the Good Old USA, it is just another example of how they act over there, both sides
 
10850042_581741135293067_1529288855362232501_n.png
 
As usual the ET rightwing clown car sees something happen and get it assbackwards. Here's what happened: an arrogant and foolish Hollywood corporation which has nothing to do with liberalism decides to make a stupid so-called comedy that slaps the face of a living ruthless dictator in order to make a profit -- not art, not a political statement, just another crass grab at profits by hitting at a target that is presumed to be safe to hit. Surprise! The presumed easy target finds a way to place his boot between the legs of the arrogant prigs at Sony and make them squeal like little piggies. It almost makes NK admirable for once. Almost.

The bottom line: everybody has heard the expression Don't Poke the Bear. But every now and then some fool goes and does it. When said fool gets his head torn off, does it make sense to get mad at the bear or reason that what happened to the fool was just evolution in action?

When you pick a fight with even a seemingly weak opponent, make sure your pants aren't around your ankles. Sony picked a fight while having a weak, easily breachble IT department and they've learned the consequences of being both arrogant and stupid. When North Korea attacks our national security network or our financial system or our power grid, I'll join the call to nuke them. But when they bitchslap an arrogant entertainment company that picked a fight for no sane reason, I just sit back and laugh.

When I see the intellectually dishonesty of the Hollywood left in this situation where they back down totally from criticizing a foreign brutal dictator but are perfectly willing to denigrate any right-wing politician in the U.S. - I am reminded of George Orwell's struggle to get Animal Farm published after World War 2 in an environment where the media and book publishers actively sided with the communists. It was fine to pen a book that mocked British politicians in the later 1940s, but not acceptable to disparage the Soviet communists. Many book publishers in the U.K. refused to be publish Animal Farm because of opposition from the British Ministry of Information (which later was found to be totally infiltrated with Soviet spies).

This all outlined in Orwell's "How the essay came to be written" which was published in 1972 (two decades+ after his death) because it would never been published by the red friendly press in the 50s or 60s. Orwell rails against literary censorship in England where unpopular ideas are silenced and inconvenient facts are kept in the dark without the need for an official ban. He rails out against the lack of serious criticism of the Soviet regime and leftist intelligentsia which swallowed and repeated Soviet propaganda from 1941 onwards - he demonstrated examples of the complete disregard for historical truth and intellectual decency.

George Orwell "How this essay came to be written -Freedom of the Press” (The Proposed Preface to Animal Farm)
 
  • Like
Reactions: jem
Back
Top