I thought I'd start this to keep myself accountable. I only say this because I've been making the same mistakes repeatedly, and it's been costing me. I've been consistently profitable in the AM sticking to my strategy religiously, but frequently screw it all up in the afternoon by wanting more and not following my system.
The interesting thing is that I've noted these psychological errors several times, but never really held myself accountable. I started writing my basic "a-ha" moments on a sheet of paper next to my trading desk.
A simple look at my performance reveals that if I hadn't traded after, say, 12PM, then I'd be green/break even every day. Instead, I bleed out in the afternoon because I can't stay out of it. Also, the PM movement doesn't really sync with what I do. Another reason to stay away from it.
What ends up happening (I think*) is that the first post-12PM loss I take wounds the ego of a healthy morning and I start to take wild punches. It makes sense from a psychological point of view.
I remember Mark Douglas saying, "there was a guy who should only trade 1 hr. a day then walk away for the day." I need to apply a similar concept rigorously.
Learning the nuisances of how to trade successfully has been a costly process. I sometimes wonder whether long-term successful trading could be learned without the early losses. My hunch is almost definitely not. What the experienced traders say regarding "learning about yourself" is certainly true, and it is a unique way of learning another side of you. I'm entirely confident that when I learn to stay disciplined within my rules, I can be profitable long-term. That is the only reason I keep paying the market such an outlandish tuition.
Other behavioral observations: I'm pretty calm in the AM during my session, waiting for the right plays, and I go. I'm calm and so the "execution" side is smooth and relaxed. I get a bit jittery by the afternoon and also make finger errors in the PM. This, of course, bothers me even more. So, here is to cutting it off by 12 PM.
New Rule 1: Had a great AM? Cut it off by 12 PM.
New Rule 2: Had a terrible AM? Cut if off by 12 PM.
I've no doubt the second will be infinitely more difficult to follow than the first.
The interesting thing is that I've noted these psychological errors several times, but never really held myself accountable. I started writing my basic "a-ha" moments on a sheet of paper next to my trading desk.
A simple look at my performance reveals that if I hadn't traded after, say, 12PM, then I'd be green/break even every day. Instead, I bleed out in the afternoon because I can't stay out of it. Also, the PM movement doesn't really sync with what I do. Another reason to stay away from it.
What ends up happening (I think*) is that the first post-12PM loss I take wounds the ego of a healthy morning and I start to take wild punches. It makes sense from a psychological point of view.
I remember Mark Douglas saying, "there was a guy who should only trade 1 hr. a day then walk away for the day." I need to apply a similar concept rigorously.
Learning the nuisances of how to trade successfully has been a costly process. I sometimes wonder whether long-term successful trading could be learned without the early losses. My hunch is almost definitely not. What the experienced traders say regarding "learning about yourself" is certainly true, and it is a unique way of learning another side of you. I'm entirely confident that when I learn to stay disciplined within my rules, I can be profitable long-term. That is the only reason I keep paying the market such an outlandish tuition.
Other behavioral observations: I'm pretty calm in the AM during my session, waiting for the right plays, and I go. I'm calm and so the "execution" side is smooth and relaxed. I get a bit jittery by the afternoon and also make finger errors in the PM. This, of course, bothers me even more. So, here is to cutting it off by 12 PM.
New Rule 1: Had a great AM? Cut it off by 12 PM.
New Rule 2: Had a terrible AM? Cut if off by 12 PM.
I've no doubt the second will be infinitely more difficult to follow than the first.