Son of If You Can Draw a Straight Line . . .

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from niko:

Db, from today´s discussion there was this issue about volume that got me very interested.

At the time my reading was that price was falling, but volume was decreasing (strength sign). The fact that after my entry buyers pushed prices from 90.50 on increasing volume did not help to reinforce confidence in the short.

Then bars were showing LHs, but volume was not increasing, it was only until 10:35 that I started seeing confirmation from volume.

Decreasing volume is not a sign of anything except that trading activity is decreasing. Whether buyers pushed prices higher has nothing to do with volume. Volume is simply a measure of activity. Buying pressure and selling pressure are reflected in price movement. As long as price is going in the desired direction, who cares what the volume is?
 
I look at volume but it's not a major factor in my analysis. In fact when Db had me focus on price without volume did my veil got parted. Before that I was just attempting to buy S and selling R and getting confused when it wouldn't respect the S/R.

Considering you've recently started to see price better and also you're not getting terrified of the movement as you'r brain is getting used to the pace I would advise you to focus on the context of the price itself. Later when you have more command over price and the supply/demand dynamic you may introduce volume and perhaps see for yourself what it can do for you.

Price: Moving up
Volume: High
Meaning: High intensity fighting between supply/demand with demand winning.

Price: Moving down
Volume: High
Meaning: Hight intensity fighting between supply/demand with supply winning.

Price: Moving up
Volume: Low
Meaning: Low intensity of participation by supply. Supply holding back for now.

Price: Moving down
Volume: Low
Meaning: Low intensity of participation by demand. Demand holding back for now.

It tells you whether the fighting is intense or weak but doesn't really tell you whether the supply or demand might return with a vengeance any time. Eventually it's the price that's the major determining factor of what's fine with your position and what's not, no matter what the volume is indicating.

Then of course there are variations of volume rising on up moves and falling on pull backs and the opposite. All this has some value, but the value isn't enough to lose sight of price itself. It's the price and the supply/demand that's king and the rest is the jingles for the seasoned to supplement the main information.

Gringo
 
Quote from llIHeroic:

I actually got to put in a little time this morning; haven't been able to for a couple weeks. Exits are scaled on my chart, so there's just two trades, a short and a long.

I saw earlier that niko had the same trouble with not being able to hang on to the first short at the breach of the 50%.

Does anyone have an idea of some of the contextual clues the two of us missed of the sellers still being dominant? Usually if price is creeping up to the 50% mark slowly and passes it a little, I am not so quick to attribute it to buyer strength. However, this RET jumped up about 5 points in two minutes. After the 50% and the LSH breach, I wasn't seeing any reasons to keep hanging on, especially since price was moving rather quickly.

Any thoughts?

--

I don't feel as bad about the partial exit on the second long. I could've held the whole position until the LSL (which coincidentally was right around the 50% mark of the entire opening movement now that I look at it) since it wasn't even that far away, but I suppose I was feeling hesitant since it looked like a break of 90 was being rejected at the time, and I had price in a 70-90 TR for the past two days in my notes.

However, the trade was still a really nice one even after breaking off a piece right before the climax. It's also a little easier to analyze in hindsight. We were above the 50% of the movement, still had room to go for a OH retest, and the RET that broke the first line was pretty slow and weak. Definitely going to look at giving conditions like these a little more room in the future. Not as certain about understanding the correct information to process about the first trade though.

Depends on where you are in your process. If your stomach still tightens when price breaks an SL or DL, then just get out. The hanging back part will come later. In the meantime, the drill will become more automatic and you won't have to think about whether you should exit on these breaks or run the risk of incurring unnecessary losses.
 
Quote from Gringo:

Then of course there are variations of volume rising on up moves and falling on pull backs and the opposite. All this has some value, but the value isn't enough to lose sight of price itself. It's the price and the supply/demand that's king and the rest is the jingles for the seasoned to supplement the main information.

Gringo

Some value but not much. Most of what's written about volume is nonsense, written by people who don't understand it any better than their audiences. They'll say for example that volume with rising price should be heavy. That's baloney. Heavy volume means that sellers are fighting it every step of the way. On the other hand, they'll say that light volume with rising price suggests lack of conviction. Also baloney. If buyers were lacking conviction, price wouldn't be rising. Price is rising on low volume because sellers aren't interested for whatever reason in impeding the move.
 
Quote from dbphoenix:

Depends on where you are in your process. If your stomach still tightens when price breaks an SL or DL, then just get out. The hanging back part will come later. In the meantime, the drill will become more automatic and you won't have to think about whether you should exit on these breaks or run the risk of incurring unnecessary losses.

Okay, thank you for the feedback. I didn't initially think to view these things as a function of my internal confidence level.

If I had to assess myself, I would say that I am comfortable with the DL break / 50% mark scaled exits, but uncertain when things begin to move past that point, so as you've advised I will stay with those until I begin to feel more comfortable, and focus first on learning to avoid premature exits near the beginning of my trades when the lines fan slightly without showing overt weakness.

---

Just as a learning exercise at this point, I re-drew the chart of the short with a hypothetical situation of buyers continuing to gain momentum.

I would be interested in hearing other people's opinions and thoughts on how (when/if) they would exit the short [red line] if this is how things were playing out in RT instead, and especially your thought process behind it. The green lines were my exits, half and half.
 

Attachments

Quote from dbphoenix:

Decreasing volume is not a sign of anything except that trading activity is decreasing. Whether buyers pushed prices higher has nothing to do with volume. Volume is simply a measure of activity. Buying pressure and selling pressure are reflected in price movement. As long as price is going in the desired direction, who cares what the volume is?

Thank you, noted and understood. See you tomorrow.
 
Quote from llIHeroic:

I would be interested in hearing other people's opinions and thoughts on how (when/if) they would exit the short [red line] if this is how things were playing out in RT instead, and especially your thought process behind it. The green lines were my exits, half and half.

To elaborate:

It was clear that niko and I were missing a full understanding of the S/D dynamics at the time of the RET, and DB alluded that a correct perception of the context would've kept us in the trade.

One can clearly see that our exits on the RET were premature, but I am uncertain as to what additional information we could have waited a bit longer on before deciding that there was no compelling reason to be in the short anymore.

Perhaps someone can point out some suggestions via the exercise.
 
Quote from dbphoenix:

Decreasing volume is not a sign of anything except that trading activity is decreasing. Whether buyers pushed prices higher has nothing to do with volume. Volume is simply a measure of activity. Buying pressure and selling pressure are reflected in price movement. ?

+1
 
No one has posted anything yet but I'm sure it's obvious to everyone that we tested 3400 to the upside, again, and 3360 to the downside, again, and are right back at 3380.
 
9:27 Yep. We are in an uptrend now, but we might find some selling around this area at the open. If buyers can keep it up then I think they could aim for 400 or not. Only price will tell us.
:31 DL broken.
:32 I guess the rejection of 80 was reason enough for a long (no line) marked the long at 82.75, but did not have the guts to take it.
:37 Long at 37.75
:42 That was a bad call, Now I am short at 83,25 but it is not feeling right either. SL broken.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top