Quote from r3algood:
Yes, I will tone down the size of the charts in future posts.
No gaps: (24 hour chart) noted.
"One question, though, did you annotate these charts in real time? Some of the annotations suggest that you did not."
This first session of marking the charts up in this manner was not in real time, though I did slowly scroll bar-by-bar. I think that Friday's price action being so fresh in my mind skewed the markup process. In future posts I will annotate sessions that are sufficiently in the past (or wait and see where the other members of this thread take the discussion, if past charts are unwelcome I will refrain from posting them and taking up space unless other members find it good practice).
Db, in annotating this chart I found a new-found sense of confidence due to the simplicity and realistic nature of letting price decide instead of trying to let my thoughts "guide the market". How foolish to think that the market should respond to my wishes and desires.
I look forward to learning more.
Thanks
I assumed that these annotations were not made in real time because there was a mix of timid trades and aggressive ones. That most often occurs when someone is trying to reconstruct a trading scheme while knowing how it all turns out. You can plot these lines on a few hindsight charts just to see how it works, but this won't help you much when you're trading. For that you'll have to use replay, and begin plotting your lines at the right edge of whatever you've chosen at random (scrolling bar by bar is not replay since the beginning of the chart will usually be compressed against the top or bottom of the frame; this is not how price will look in real time: it will fill the frame).
There's not much point in posting hindsight charts. What matters is not what you did or should have done but what you're going to do. If, for example, NY were to open in five minutes, what would you do? What would you look for? Unless and until you know that, annotating hindsight charts gives a false sense of security.