Quote from Scientist:
Well, if I've read so many books, chances are I have had a few more different opinions to refer to.
"Extended life given by Medical Science" is completely relative and still doesn't mean that life is given by science. Today, we have reached a point where more life is being destroyed by science than is given by it.
I interpret stupidly? Well, make a point! You haven't really answered to my concepts yet!
I don't care how much more you credit Carl Sagan. I'm not craving for your credit, I have plenty enough credit you would be surprised.
To say this here, Carl Sagan isn't necessarily an objective writer.
Large parts of his book are negative or destructive in terms of trying to attack anything right-wing such as catholicism or the right-wing parties (republicans?). While I'm fundamentally left-wing, I still don't agree with his approach. Didn't even come up with theory that Hitler conspired with Pius etc? I mean, seriously, he had no evidence to back up his theories, and a scientist that makes large claims while not being able to deliver evidence, is not a qualified examining scientist.
Besides, the critics have literally torn him apart Not because he was revolutionary, but for exactly the reasons I just told you.
I have books of 25+ better, more enlightening and more meaningful scientists than him. As said, I'd recommend you read "Consilience".
Good Luck
~The Scientist