Quote from mutluit:
Just look at wiki. It's not for the layman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itō's_lemma
i read that actually.....
Quote from mutluit:
Just look at wiki. It's not for the layman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itō's_lemma
Black-Scholes pricing formula for vanilla option can be, indeed, derived without the use of stochastic calculus and Ito's lemma - that derivation uses pure probabilistic and risk-neutral approach. However, if you can show that you can derive Black-Scholes SDE without the use of Ito's lemma, that would be a feat.Quote from mutluit:
This thread is not about my BlackScholes implementation w/o Ito's lemma. I'm also not willing to publish it here in this forum.

I just wonder why people are so stubborn not to understand this simple method. The HV is just for orientation, you can pull in the desired vola you like, the option pricing engine just processes your input and gives the output. So, what is wrong with it? Nothing!Quote from Emilio_Lizardo:
Your idea that you can backtest option trading strats on model-based prices derived from recent realized vol is the most idiotic thing I've heard in a long time.
That's what I did, there's nothing more re the BS formula.Quote from sle:
Black-Scholes pricing formula for vanilla option can be, indeed, derived without the use of stochastic calculus and Ito's lemma -
Research is time consuming, the last time I studied this was 3 years ago, I would need some break to be in the stuff again.
that derivation uses pure probabilistic and risk-neutral approach. However, if you can show that you can derive Black-Scholes SDE without the use of Ito's lemma, that would be a feat.
The following table uses gradually rising vola from 20% to 30% in 10 days.Quote from mutluit:
Attached are tables for 2months options (t=40/253), and AnnVola=20%, 30%, 40%, for the first 10 days.