Quote from ljyoung:
...BUT I think that achilles is saying that when the channel boundaries are "lined up" if you will, that it is easier to anticipate a price reversal in the higher (slower) fractal...
lj
That's the gist of it.
And perhaps I jumped the gun at bit. My bad.
In Jacks parlance, when price meets the converged LTL of LT, IT and ST you get very significant resistence or support.
Jack has noted this a couple times in CFBW.
The relevance of this is somewhat lost with the ES because of its dynamics - tighter range and shorter trends make for a *relatively* slower instrument.
The analogy is similar to the YM versus ES. YM trades faster - more pronounced - while the ES is slower and more deliberate.
Currency pairs fall along the same continuum in terms of cycling rate or speed. Euro, Nzd and AUS are relatively slow and methodical - think of taking Grandma for an ice cream cone. Yen crosses, notably the GBPJPY - think Daytona 500.
The relevance here - on faster instruments, the corresponding LT, IT and ST are much shorter. Therefore, the frequency of their occurrence is much higher. Thats key. For GBPJPY, the corresponding LT might be the 2 hourly or 1 hourly. IT 15 mins. ST 5 mins. The trends are simply that short because the range is that fast.
For an FX trader, like me, this 'aligning of the stars' is important. It happens on the ES too, just less frequent.
Good trading.

