Software/Hardware needed to trade after the FOMC

i got an aapl laptop and am experiencing same problems with cpu maxed: processor has 1.2gig and it's not enough to handle TWS during fast mkts and/or when running too many symbols. Number of open charts also stretches cpu.
Although I upgraded ram to 768mb, things are not much better.
Processor is clearly the culprit imo.
 
Quote from Bitstream:

i got an aapl laptop and am experiencing same problems with cpu maxed: processor has 1.2gig and it's not enough to handle TWS during fast mkts and/or when running too many symbols. Number of open charts also stretches cpu.
Although I upgraded ram to 768mb, things are not much better.
Processor is clearly the culprit imo.

More likely, it's TWS at fault, and faster CPU won't help much.
 
Quote from Charlie Dow:

Windows 2000 & XP recommends 1 gig of memory minimum for ultimate proformance when utilizing any charting software package & data feed . . . call MS tech support to verify that for yourself. And since 2000 won't be supported after the end of the year, what OS is in your PC?

But running almost half of the recommended memory is just fine, according to the OS/PC expert "nkhoi". This is a perfect example of why you take everything you read here with a grain of salt until you can verify it for yourself with someone you KNOW, knows what they are talking about.

thnx, I overlooked that memory part, as good practice I always max out the memory for any of computer I have. I'm not a pc expert but I own/maintain about 9 laptops and one Frankenstein desktop.
 
Quote from Bitstream:

what do u mean?
something wrong with workstation...how can I fix it?

Figure out which feature of the software is causing the problem and either turn it off or run less of it. Whenever your CPU is pegged it's almost always the fault of the software, and getting more horsepower does little to improve things.

I've run the same software package since my PII, 192 RAM, Win98 days... 4 monitors, about 30-35 live charts open and the only time my system has even been taxed at all was due to some sotware app I was trying out.
 
Quote from gnome:

Figure out which feature of the software is causing the problem and either turn it off or run less of it. Whenever your CPU is pegged it's almost always the fault of the software, and getting more horsepower does little to improve things.

Tried to troubleshoot it and stripped features bear to essential. I mean if cpu is always stretched (and not to 100%, but 90-95%), it seems logical to me that more powerful one should breed easly.
That's the problem the OP is experiencing, are u saying that he's got no cpu problems too?
 
Quote from Charlie Dow:

Windows 2000 & XP recommends 1 gig of memory minimum for ultimate proformance when utilizing any charting software package & data feed . . . call MS tech support to verify that for yourself...."

"... But running almost half of the recommended memory is just fine, according to the OS/PC expert "nkhoi". This is a perfect example of why you take everything you read here with a grain of salt until you can verify it for yourself with someone you KNOW, knows what they are talking about.

Memory "need" is something where you don't have to guess. Just check Task Manager and see how much is used normally and at peak and have enough for that. Additional memory beyond what's needed for your most memory intensive application is money wasted. And for most trading multi-tasking setups on WinXP, 512mb is enough.
 
Quote from Bitstream:

Tried to troubleshoot it and stripped features bear to essential. I mean if cpu is always stretched (and not to 100%, but 90-95%), it seems logical to me that more powerful one should breed easly.
That's the problem the OP is experiencing, are u saying that he's got no cpu problems too?

What exactly is using all the CPU. Its not usual to have it run that high consistently
 
it may be something with Java.

1) get 1.5... version
2) on some systems, Java had a problem with graphics. Needed some command line parameter change to get around it. I don't remember of the top of my head what it was (Anyone?)

TWS should not take up much CPU on its own on a 1.5Ghz system (or similar)
 
Back
Top