"Best" software (especially when it comes to S&C's software reviews) doesn't mean it'll help you make a dime.
You've got to go some just to buy into EWs in the first place. Especially when even those using them warn you that you can't just trust the computer's "count" and many of the gurus on the subject never seem to get the wrong prediction by using EWs - they're predictions are often wrong but it's never the EW principle that's flawed it was just that they "had their wave count wrong". They often then continue to be wrong, right up until it's all over and then they magically have the right wave count and once again EW was right on - ain't hindsight wonderful?
In fact EWs are absolutely amazing in their hindsight (the thousands of possible counts can always be ultimately fit to any price curve), but so often fall short of any real predictive power.
That all of the EW software out there have to compute and then compare thousands of potential "wave counts" and then guess at which is probably the "best" count, that two pieces of software can easily and regularly do produce different "best" counts, and that the "best" count can suddenly be completely different on the next bar should at least raise some questions.
