Socrates Examines Technical Strategy

Quote from big_cabrito:

I be tradin' ES, for me, 2 points is the shitz, I can usually get an entry that allows me 2 points or less stop loss, whilst allowin' potential 10 points gain, not a bad tradeoff given that I'm enterin' on high probability setups in the first place...




Well howdy 'Big C', u shure aint makin sense ta me.......patenshal 10 poiwnts?


Wot fukin NQ ave u bin a wachin lately?


Hahahaha!
 
Quote from Dackster:

Quote from big_cabrito:

I be tradin' ES, for me, 2 points is the shitz, I can usually get an entry that allows me 2 points or less stop loss, whilst allowin' potential 10 points gain, not a bad tradeoff given that I'm enterin' on high probability setups in the first place...




Well howdy 'Big C', u shure aint makin sense ta me.......patenshal 10 poiwnts?


Wot fukin NQ ave u bin a wachin lately?


Hahahaha!

Not sure why this is funny, Dack... ok, mebbe not 10, mebbe 6-8, who cares?
 
Big little goat, 8 ticks to me is a breathtaking stop. With all due respect, if anybody else said that I would respond that you don't know exactly where your REAL entry is. But I don't trade ES, so I dunno.

Thanks for your result on radome entry. I haven't done that for a long time because I don't backtest any more.

Please do send me your site. Got enny nekkid wimmen onnit?
 
Quote from big_cabrito:

Not sure why this is funny, Dack... ok, mebbe not 10, mebbe 6-8, who cares?



6-8? I've obviously missed some part of your joke, Big C. I'm willing to leave it at that (but only if you are.....big boy).



Dackster.
 
Not being totally sure why this thread is suffered to continue, I return to some semi-technical content.

Ehorn, I am beginnning to wonder about you. You claimed you did a simple SCT code in 40 SLOCs, but it is taking me 60. Admittedly there is a lot of room for error in this comparison. Help an old man out, will you, and tell me how many statements/instructions there are in your 40 SLOCs? And what language or pseudo-code it is in? Mine uses about 120 statements in E-Signal. FYIA.

P.S. to moderation: the technical content of this is that I will continue to refine and post my Easy-SCT code results. I distrust that 41.14 net NQ points (simmed) on Friday was enough to renew my contract for another day.
 
Quote from big_cabrito:

Sure 'mano, I think we not on the same sheet of music here...

Peace bro',

Big C




Big C, my sincerest apologies (and i do mean that). In my alcohol fuelled frenzy of a reply to yours, for some reason i was thinking NQ.....


I hope you don't take offence.
 
On a note of some general interest to all of ET, Big Cabrito, why are you posting on another forum and not on ET? I mean, you can get so much more abuse here than anywhere else. And much more bad advice. I am sure that Baron would like to know what he needs to do to lower ET's standards to get your patronage.
 
Quote from Socrates:

Dackster, we were getting on so well until you spelt "offense" as "offence". Say it ain't so!



Haha

First i see ES as NQ, now i'm being offen'c'ive.....a timely exit for me....i think.


Good trading all,


Dackster.
 
Back
Top