Sockpuppets, shame, and our ad hominem heavy board

Quote from Maverick74:

No, let me try again. Who exactly reported who? What the hell happened? Ricter didn't report himself. It can't just be a personal attack. That's all we have down here are personal attacks. LOL. Did Ricter insult Baron's wife?

It is in the archives, Ricter failed to switch over when he reponded as a sock puppet. So he got caught.

He is not a trader, and he got caught with a sock puppet. He was actually stressing about being banned.
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

It is in the archives, Ricter failed to switch over when he reponded as a sock puppet. So he got caught.

He is not a trader, and he got caught with a sock puppet. He was actually stressing about being banned.

What alias was he using? Did Ricter have a mid life crisis or something? LOL. What the hell is going on around here.
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

It is in the archives, Ricter failed to switch over when he reponded as a sock puppet. So he got caught.

He is not a trader, and he got caught with a sock puppet. He was actually stressing about being banned.
Just a small clarification, but I was not stressing about a ban, I was expecting one. (To be honest, part of me was almost hoping for one.)
 
Quote from Trader666:

Right... try to sidestep being a liar by accusing me of sidestepping. OK DAS, whatever you say :p You're the one who hid behind the internet, I offered to take it live. And I couldn't care less about an apology from you because you've lost all credibility with me as I've already told you. I only brought it up to point out your colossal hypocrisy. Which you're totally oblivious to, just like your stupidity.

I offered to provide materials to back up my assertions and let the community judge, asking the same of you. You balked and offered a more circuitous route that involved people you know, lawyers, and microfiche? Also, you are repeating yourself again. You've already told me you don't care about an apology (after you cried about wanting one). Dude, are you bi polar? Also, are you a leg?
 
Quote from Ricter:

Just a small clarification, but I was not stressing about a ban, I was expecting one. (To be honest, part of me was almost hoping for one.)

Ricter, what happened man?
 
He was on the battlefield, moron, NOT in a courtroom. What part of that don't you understand?

So by Wikipedia America brought the 911 attacks on itself? Where's the CIA report you've referred to?

What other country? al-Awlaki was a U.S. citizen and so was his son. If my father became al-Qaeda's senior recruiter I'd have no problem with the United States killing him. Would never happen, but are you saying that if your father became al-Qaeda's senior recruiter and the United States killed him, you'd become a mortal enemy of the United States?
Quote from DAS Trader:

Yes, legal proceedings generally occur in a courtroom. Very good Trader666. US citizens are afforded due process under the law. A courtroom is where that process is supposed to occur. Good job. This did not happen with Awlaki and it sets the precedent that it can happen to any US citizen. THAT was my concern.

I called it an assassination because that's what it was. He was placed on a list and and killed. Please read since apparently that word is not truly embedded in your vocabulary:

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/assassination

Also, I did not know we were at war with Yemen. When did we declare war there? And keep in mind, it is very difficult to be outraged at everything all at once. It tends to make conversations about specific topics difficult.

Blowback. Please read:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowback_(intelligence)

I can say without a shadow of a doubt if another country dropped bombs on my father, killing him, I would become that country's mortal enemy. The real question is, what would you do if that happened to you?
 
Quote from Trader666:

He was on the battlefield, moron, NOT in a courtroom. What part of that don't you understand?

Yemen is not a battlefield. We are not at war with Yemen. What part of that is unclear?

Quote from Trader666:

So by Wikipedia America brought the 911 attacks on itself? Where's the CIA report you've referred to?

The link references where the assertions are coming from. You seem to be hung up on the word "report".

Quote from Trader666:What other country? al-Awlaki was a U.S. citizen and so was his son. If my father became al-Qaeda's senior recruiter I'd have no problem with the United States killing him.

Any country or entity. Can you prove he was a senior Al Qaeda recruiter? If you can that's great, because our government never bothered to.

Quote from Trader666:Would never happen, but are you saying that if your father became al-Qaeda's senior recruiter and the United States killed him, you'd become a mortal enemy of the United States?

Like I said, can you prove he was a senior level recruiter for Al Qaeda? If so please provide that "proof" (understanding exactly what that word means...maybe that's asking too much of you).
 
Again you lie. I offered go with the officer of the court of Magna's choice and to take it live but you insisted on hiding behind the internet. Same with your lies about the apology. I couldn't care less what a dishonorable "Marine" like you "thinks."

P.S. The community HAS decided about you. Look at how they rate your threads.
Quote from DAS Trader:

I offered to provide materials to back up my assertions and let the community judge, asking the same of you. You balked and offered a more circuitous route that involved people you know, lawyers, and microfiche? Also, you are repeating yourself again. You've already told me you don't care about an apology (after you cried about wanting one). Dude, are you bi polar? Also, are you a leg?
 
Quote from Ricter:

You can get the gist in the first few replies to the "Congressman Allen West" thread.

Wow, Ricter...such language. LOL. That seemed pretty random and out of no where. So Baron gave you a stay of execution huh? He must have gotten a call from pretty high up. :)
 
Back
Top