So, When Does The War Start?

When Will The Iranian War Begin?

  • Before The 2012 Election

    Votes: 4 30.8%
  • After The Election But In 2012

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • In 2013

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • Never

    Votes: 7 53.8%

  • Total voters
    13
By Reza Kahlili

Just days after the breakdown of talks with the West over Iran’s nuclear program, the deputy chief commander of the Revolutionary Guards announced that there soon will be war – and that Allah will ensure his forces are victorious.

The last round of talks between Iran and the P5+1 (the United States, Britain, France, China, Russia and Germany) ended in Moscow last week without any agreement on Iran’s illicit nuclear program.

Gen. Hossein Salami, in a televised interview, boasted that, “Iran has complete control of all the enemy’s interests around the world and is on a path to reach equivalency with world powers.” The commander emphasized that Iran’s nuclear program is irreversible, the Islamic Republic News Agency reported.

Salami said war is inevitable, and the Iranian forces are ready.

“The current sanctions will only help Iran with its progress, and the Iranian ballistic missiles can target the enemy’s moving carriers with 100 percent accuracy,” he warned the West. “The Guards’ operational plan includes a radius of deterrence in the region in which all interests of the enemy have been identified, and in case of war, those interests will be attacked.”

Guards’ commanders have stated previously that all U.S. bases in the region are targeted with missiles and will be attacked should America strike Iran.

Salami said Iranian ballistic missiles can travel at several times the speed of sound and cannot easily be tracked and destroyed. “Our defense inventory is so great that at times our brothers in the Guards face limitations with space.”

The Revolutionary Guards have more than 1,000 ballistic missiles capable of reaching all U.S. bases in the region, all of Israel and some capitals in Europe. In collaboration with China and North Korea, they are also working on intercontinental ballistic missiles.

Salami said the Guards are on high alert, adding, “Our forces in relation to our internal security will complete their mission with all of their capability.”

In 2009, millions of Iranians took to the street demanding regime change, but ultimately the uprising was cruelly suppressed and many Iranians were tortured and executed. According to statistics from the Islamic regime’s Justice Department, all Iranian prisons are overflowing and there is a need for more prisons. As reported by Iranian officials, last year alone more than 600 people were executed, including women.

Salami repeated that the Guards are ready for war, which is close, and though it will be very difficult, “We have faith in Allah.”

In another sign that the Iranian officials expect war, Iran’s supreme leader Wednesday urged all factions of the regime, political and military, to unite and remain steadfast in defense of Islam in confronting the “arrogant powers.”

According to Sepah News, the official media outlet of the Guards, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in a meeting with regime officials, stated, “Today the arrogant powers of the world have focused all their power to hurt the Islamic republic and stop its progress (nuclear program), which motivates the Islamic world.”

Referring to sanctions on Iran, Khamenei said, “America itself is surrounded by serious problems, which cannot be solved. … Their main goal is to separate the Islamic republic from the support of its people. … Allah willing, this conspiracy will also be defeated.”


http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/iran-there-will-be-war-and-well-win/
 
Quote from CokeNotPepsi:

oh pleaseeeee

you are not fooling anyone

what do you expect Iran to say, Yes Attack us We are defenseless and we expect to die humbly



Reza Kahlili is ex CIA for Pet's sake, everyone knows Zionists and hardcore US war machine want to destroy Iran because they realize strong Iran would make future plan of Entire Middle East control difficult.

Israel wants to be the only one with nukes in the region the only bully on the block. And doesn't want anyone to bitch while they erase Palestinians, enlarge Israeli borders and revise history.

Yes war is coming, but this foolhardy war will jump from your CNN tv into your living room.

This war YOU WILL FEEL ON YOUR OWN SKIN.............you see...this war will be a final war........Are you ready to die for Zionists ?

(response to the threats) yawn

Anybody with an ounce economic sense knows we are perfectly capable of destroying ourselves.

It's kinda hard thinking of more backward ass thinkers than liberals /socialists until we consider the muslim world.

thanks for the reminder
 
Quote from CokeNotPepsi:

oh pleaseeeee

you are not fooling anyone

what do you expect Iran to say, Yes Attack us We are defenseless and we expect to die humbly



Reza Kahlili is ex CIA for Pet's sake, everyone knows Zionists and hardcore US war machine want to destroy Iran because they realize strong Iran would make future plan of Entire Middle East control difficult.

Israel wants to be the only one with nukes in the region the only bully on the block. And doesn't want anyone to bitch while they erase Palestinians, enlarge Israeli borders and revise history.

Yes war is coming, but this foolhardy war will jump from your CNN tv into your living room.

This war YOU WILL FEEL ON YOUR OWN SKIN.............you see...this war will be a final war........Are you ready to die for Zionists ?

The greedy arabs want Israel for their own. The arab countries surrounding israel equate to millions of sq kilometers of land. Israel is only 20k sq kilometers. Of course Israel should be the one with nukes. Have the arabs give up more land and maybe we will let you have some nukes. Give israel its original land back that it had 3000 years ago...until then, the arabs are sitting illegally on israeli soil.
 
on a related note:
Looks like the politicians are misleading us on syria.
Last week's false flag story of baseless Middle Eastern provocation refuses to go away. Even after, in a shocking turn of events, US intelligence confirmed this weekend that Syria's version of events surrounding the downed Turkish F-4 jet story was the right one all along, pulling the media narrative rug right from under Hillary Clinton's provocative feet (and making others wonder just which country is the only one that stands to benefit of NATO does pull Article 4 or 5 and does invade Syria on now invalidated and false premises), today we read that Turkey continues to try to escalate. From the BBC: "Turkey has scrambled six F-16 fighters jets near its border with Syria after Syrian helicopters came close to the border, the country's army says. A total of six jets were sent to the area in response to three such incidents on Sunday, although there was no border violation, the Reuters news agency quoted the statement saying. On Friday, Turkey said it had begun deploying rocket launchers and anti-aircraft guns along the border in response to the downing of its F-4 Phantom jet." Of course, without an actual confirmed provocation, such as the one Turkey itself pulled against Syria, it is left with the same media rhetoric that continues to expose just one side of the Syrian story - the Western media spun one. "Turkey has strongly criticised Syria's response to the 16-month anti-government uprising, which has seen more than 30,000 Syrian refugees enter Turkey." Fair enough, we do however wonder what Syria would say about Turkey's treatment of Kurdish minorities. Finally, confirmation that just as we first suggested two weeks, this whole incident has been nothing but a provocation stage test to get NATO involved without any of the facts being on the table, comes from no other source than US military intelligence.

From the WSJ:

U.S. intelligence indicates that a Turkish warplane shot down by Syrian forces was most likely hit by shore-based antiaircraft guns while it was inside Syrian airspace, American officials said, a finding in tune with Syria's account and at odds with Turkey.

The Turkish government, which moved tanks to the Syrian border after the June 22 incident, says the debris fell in Syrian waters, but maintains its fighter was shot down without warning in international airspace. Ankara also has said the jet was hit too far from Syrian territory to have been engaged by an antiaircraft gun.

Damascus has said it shot down the plane with an antiaircraft battery with an effective range of about 1.5 miles.

"We see no indication that it was shot down by a surface-to-air missile" as Turkey says, said a senior defense official. Officials declined to specify the sources of their information. The senior U.S. defense official cautioned that much remains unknown about the incident.
And finally the truth:

A former senior U.S. official who worked closely with Turkey said he believed the flight's course was meant to test Syria's response. "You think that the airplane was there by mistake?" the former official said.

"These countries are all testing how fast they get picked up and how fast someone responds," said a senior U.S. official. "It's part of training."

The Turkish official said the plane wasn't on a surveillance mission. "All NATO members have condemned the Syrian hostile act and have supported Turkey," the official said.
Gee, let's see here: confirmed self-defense and yet "all NATO members" are promptly on the side of the aggressor. How original. Finally, there's this:

The U.S.-Turkish relationship is unlikely to be affected by the apparent discrepancies in accounts of the downing of the jet. Cooperation between Ankara and Washington has grown closer in recent months, after a period of significant strain in 2009 and 2010.

That marks a turnaround for Turkey, which 18 months ago moved to cultivate relations and trade with neighboring Muslim regimes, including Mr. Assad's, while downgrading ties with former ally Israel, raising concerns in Washington.
Which begs the question: now that the US has openly sold Turkey down the river, was this whole plan merely one spun out of that other "former ally" which after seeing its provocative clout vis-a-vis Iran's "despotic dictators" evaporate, is urgently trying to come up with other locus of potential warmongering?

Of course, as long as NATO has the back of any aggressor no matter what the facts say, all is good.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/turke...er-us-says-syrian-story-was-correct-all-along
 
I see things getting very hot in the middle east over the next 12 months. Syria, Israel, Iran, Egypt, Turkey are all in the mix.
 
Quote from pspr:

I see things getting very hot in the middle east over the next 12 months. Syria, Israel, Iran, Egypt, Turkey are all in the mix.

Are you suggesting a" wag the dog" strategy is in the works?
 
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

Are you suggesting a" wag the dog" strategy is in the works?
I prefer to think of it as similar to the Colorado forest fires. They keep jumping fire lines and are spreading nearly every where there is dry kindling.
 
The real terror is right here:

A new study funded by the Department of Homeland Security characterizes Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists.
 
Quote from OccupyThis:

The real terror is right here:

A new study funded by the Department of Homeland Security characterizes Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists.

They usually are.
 
Back
Top