He made that up. It's his way of attacking a man who beliefs are different from his own. He is not as open minded as he would have you believe.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
So what do the Liberals do now that Saddam is captured?
- Thread starter Maverick74
- Start date
He made that up. It's his way of attacking a man who beliefs are different from his own. He is not as open minded as he would have you believe.
Quote from Pabst:
So Rogue, shallowisms are the domain of the right, eh?
War for oil.
Tell me oil is not a factor.
Tax cuts for the rich.
Show me poor people who are going to get a direct tax benefit of dividend tax cuts.
Extremists' denying a woman's right to choose.
Killing the doctor who was going to perform an abortion does deny a woman's right to choose for a while.
Allowing guns to kill our children.
If a child dies of an accidental death due to guns in the house, who is responsible? The child?
Right wing conspiracy.
How far have we really come from Nixon and his crew?
The left exsists by distortion and by PANDERING to the stupidest elements in American society.
Nonsense. The left natually exists when there is an extreme right.
False. It has nothing to do with disagreeing with position, it has to do with methodology of presenting ideas. A liberal can be guilty of Hannityism.
It is a term I coined, similar to the term McCarthyism.
I would like to see it added to our lexicon, as Hannity is a classic example, nearly a living breathing caricature of one who attempts to persuade with logical fallacy, emotionalism, and self righteousness as his tools of his trade.
It defines someone who uses the techniques Sean Hannity uses in his demagoguery and deceptive political spinning.
It is a term I coined, similar to the term McCarthyism.
I would like to see it added to our lexicon, as Hannity is a classic example, nearly a living breathing caricature of one who attempts to persuade with logical fallacy, emotionalism, and self righteousness as his tools of his trade.
It defines someone who uses the techniques Sean Hannity uses in his demagoguery and deceptive political spinning.
Quote from Maverick74:
He made that up. It's his way of attacking a man who beliefs are different from his own. He is not as open minded as he would have you believe.
Tax cuts for the rich.
Show me poor people who are going to get a direct tax benefit of dividend tax cuts.
Wait a minute, aren't poor people getting a child tax credit?
Extremists' denying a woman's right to choose.
Killing the doctor who was going to perform an abortion does deny a woman's right to choose for a while.
Wait a minute, are you saying republicans are killing doctors? No crazy psychos are.
Allowing guns to kill our children.
If a child dies of an accidental death due to guns in the house, who is responsible? The child?
How about the person who left a gun out in the open for a child to use, loaded on top of that.
Show me poor people who are going to get a direct tax benefit of dividend tax cuts.
Wait a minute, aren't poor people getting a child tax credit?
Extremists' denying a woman's right to choose.
Killing the doctor who was going to perform an abortion does deny a woman's right to choose for a while.
Wait a minute, are you saying republicans are killing doctors? No crazy psychos are.
Allowing guns to kill our children.
If a child dies of an accidental death due to guns in the house, who is responsible? The child?
How about the person who left a gun out in the open for a child to use, loaded on top of that.
Quote from ARogueTrader:
So Rogue, shallowisms are the domain of the right, eh?
War for oil.
Tell me oil is not a factor.
Who ever said it wasn't a factor? Not the whole enchilada the left makes it out to be.
Tax cuts for the rich.
Show me poor people who are going to get a direct tax benefit of dividend tax cuts.
Who says they deserve one?
Extremists' denying a woman's right to choose.
Killing the doctor who was going to perform an abortion does deny a woman's right to choose for a while.
Who says she has this 'right'?
Allowing guns to kill our children.
If a child dies of an accidental death due to guns in the house, who is responsible? The child?
Er, like, yeah. And the irresponsible parent. Or whatever the context. Accidents do happen you know. But wait, I know, it was the gun's fault, right?
Right wing conspiracy.
How far have we really come from Nixon and his crew?
The left exsists by distortion and by PANDERING to the stupidest elements in American society.
Nonsense. The left natually exists when there is an extreme right.
Yup. Uh-huh. The left has been going at it hard core for decades, with nary a peep fom the right. I say Thank God that the right finally had enough of this carp and decided to fight back.
My comments in italics.
Lol. You couldn't have given better evidence that you've swallowed the left's carp, hook, line and sinker.
They've been trotting out this nonsense for years. You've obviously been completely taken by it.
Quote from Maverick74:
Wait a minute, aren't poor people getting a child tax credit?
Those with children get tax credits, poor or rich.
Wait a minute, are you saying republicans are killing doctors? No crazy psychos are.
It is purely co-incidental then that these psychos are mostly republican right to lifers, is that what you are saying?
Do we hear strong denouncement from the extreme right to lifers of this practice of killing doctors, or are they silent on the issue?
How about the person who left a gun out in the open for a child to use, loaded on top of that.
The person who left the gun out in the open, or not locked up so that children could not find it and harm themselves, are responsible for the death of a child, and should suffer criminal prosecution.
Quote from ARogueTrader:
Oh, so two wrongs make it right? The end justifies the means? All that good rationalization stuff, eh?
Oh, I see. We should all just shut up and be the 'good guys'. That'd work great.
Why don't I hear you whinging about the carp that whining bitch Michael Moore keeps spouting? Would be because you tend to agree with him? What makes that any different to me agreeing with Hannity?
Quote from spect8or:
Who ever said it wasn't a factor? Not the whole enchilada the left makes it out to be.
War for oil? Or war to stop Saddam from using non-existent WMD?
People will decide for themselves, based on available fact which was the leading reason for the war.
Bush had many many reasons in my opinion, but he had a primary reason, and secondary, tertiary, etc. reasons.
Oil was a major factor, only he knows how major of a factor it really was.
Who says they deserve one?
Who says the rich deserve one?
Who says she has this 'right'?
I believe that was Roe Vs. Wade.
Yup. Uh-huh. The left has been going at it hard core for decades, with nary a peep fom the right. I say Thank God that the right finally had enough of this carp and decided to fight back.
Fighting back on a higher level, or stooping to the lowest forms and methods of pandering, deception, and Hannityisms?