So we are actually going to be stuck with Hillary, unbelievable

[wildchild]

That's stupid, even for you.

I must have struck a nerve. I suppose it is because Ricter is Hot For Hillary.

 

[wildchild]

But much better than it was at the beginning of his presidency.

It certainly had nothing to do with the government mandated sub-prime housing bubble that was pushed almost exclusively by the Democrat party.

I wouldn't expect you to know that because you are a Bernie supporter and according to Hillary, that makes you a lazy bum living in your parent's basement. Her words, not mine.

 

[FortuneTeller]

The people in the media are smart and know what's going on. So it just seems like a liberal bias but in fact is just facts. The GOP establishment are the smart ones. That's how they got there. They are smart, so of course they know that Trump is a yuge joke and an ignorant classless douchebag used car salesman shyster. They know that he would be a disaster for the country.

So you are either blind or stupid to the fact the media is biased to the left? You need help. And yes the Republicans are the smart ones with the money. The Dumbocrats are the ones still looking for that free cheese Reagan took away from them.

 

[futurecurrents]

So you are either blind or stupid to the fact the media is biased to the left? You need help. And yes the Republicans are the smart ones with the money. The Dumbocrats are the ones still looking for that free cheese Reagan took away from them.

Yes, facts have a liberal bias. The media in general is NOT liberally biased. You are listening to turd Trump and right wing propaganda too much.

For instance, the dumb right considers the reporting on the science of global warming "liberal bias" . Horseshit. It's a fact.

 

[Scataphagos]

Protectionism... I'm for it. Each country should put its and its own people's interests first. It's a good thing for the homeland but can be exercised only up to a degree in a world-wide economy.

 

[BONECRUSHER]

Yes, facts have a liberal bias. The media in general is NOT liberally biased. You are listening to turd Trump and right wing propaganda too much.

For instance, the dumb right considers the reporting on the science of global warming "liberal bias" . Horseshit. It's a fact.

IN GENERAL TERMS...the media does have a liberal bias. Are you saying the media is exactly neutral? I don't even think Piezoe and Frederick would agree with that!

 

[Frederick Foresight]

IN GENERAL TERMS...the media does have a liberal bias. Are you saying the media is exactly neutral? I don't even think Piezoe and Frederick would agree with that!

I believe that an objective observer, unfamiliar with the political associations attributed to these labels, would conclude that "liberal" and "conservative" labels reflect the frequency with which the respective political parties resort to the truth.

 

[BONECRUSHER]

I believe that an objective observer, unfamiliar with the political associations attributed to these labels, would conclude that "liberal" and "conservative" labels reflect the frequency with which the respective political parties resort to the truth.

I'll give you media bias! The CONSTANT media coverage of George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin is an example. During this media hype, another event took place that only received a small fraction of coverage...I saw the clip one time...then had to look it up on the Net. In April 2012, a Houston nurse (black adult female) waited outside a hospital and killed a white female and stole her 3 month old baby son!

Why did the media bury this so quickly, but making sure the black kid getting shot was covered abundantly? Futurecurrents doesn't believe the media would be self serving for ratings...do you? Anyway, the media wasn't going to benefit as much covering the white woman's death, so they pretty much ignored it...or maybe they didn't want to take anything away from the social protest taking place. Where was the objectivity of the media in this case?

Do you or futurecurrents even remember this other event? If not, I rest my case!

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/houston-woman-pleads-guilty-killing-mom-stealing-baby-article-1.1522834

 

[BONECRUSHER]

I'll give you media bias! The CONSTANT media coverage of George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin is an example. During this media hype, another event took place that only received a small fraction of coverage...I saw the clip one time...then had to look it up on the Net. In April 2012, a Houston nurse (black adult female) waited outside a hospital and killed a white female and stole her 3 month old baby son!

Why did the media bury this so quickly, but making sure the black kid getting shot was covered abundantly? Futurecurrents doesn't believe the media would be self serving for ratings...do you? Anyway, the media wasn't going to benefit as much covering the white woman's death, so they pretty much ignored it...or maybe they didn't want to take anything away from the social protest taking place. Where was the objectivity of the media in this case?

Do you or futurecurrents even remember this other event? If not, I rest my case!

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/houston-woman-pleads-guilty-killing-mom-stealing-baby-article-1.1522834

FUTURECURRENTS............PLEASE READ THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Frederick Foresight]