So the most hostile and hateful anti-Trumpers here aren't Americans?
- Thread starter Poindexter
- Start date
WTF...how can today's liberals, who are set on things like not standing for the flag, be associated with the founders of the country??
To leftists... facts are conspiracy theories and conspiracies are facts.
For almost 2 years you leftist nut cases have been telling US Trump is going to jail because he colluded with Russians. Yet, the heads of the heads of the agencies have been telling you there was no evidence of that. And we see Mueller going off in a different direction. And there is no crime of collusion.
For the last months you call out conspiracy theory on almost every thread.
you have used that line with Treefrogger numerous times... yet most of what he has predicted has been happening and may continue to happen. I look forward to reading the IG report and see if what frog predicted comes out.
By the way as an American feel free to comment about politics in front of the election... you don't have to register.
You only have one truck? (joke)
For almost 2 years you leftist nut cases have been telling US Trump is going to jail because he colluded with Russians. Yet, the heads of the heads of the agencies have been telling you there was no evidence of that. And we see Mueller going off in a different direction. And there is no crime of collusion.
For the last months you call out conspiracy theory on almost every thread.
you have used that line with Treefrogger numerous times... yet most of what he has predicted has been happening and may continue to happen. I look forward to reading the IG report and see if what frog predicted comes out.
By the way as an American feel free to comment about politics in front of the election... you don't have to register.
You only have one truck? (joke)
Last edited:
trump supporters prefer vodka and cold weather 
Yeah, well I’m still waiting on all those “Clinton crime foundation” prosecutions from a uranium deal with the Russians.
Predictions are not conspiracies. Conspiracy theories are when people peddle made up stories like Jeff Sessions is a deep state liberal sympathizer as the reason Hillary Clinton is not in jail.
I have set forth my view on the upcoming Inspector General report here:
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...rt-likely-issues-my-never-humble-view.321362/
Where clearly I could be right or wrong, and knowing that in piecemeal you have disagreed with all of them and could be right or wrong. But this is a forum for people to share their views and when your ilk just pussies out rather than a position when the rubber is about to meet the road that is just weasel stuff.
But my views are summarized there to openly and shameless subject myself to review. Not a problem. I also know- as you have already started to do- that you will go on to cite a bunch of other issues - such as statements about the Uranium investigation and the Clinton Crime Foundation- which are part of other investigations which I have not asserted will be part of the IG report.
We are making progress though. I remember the days when I would criticize the FBI and you would say, okay, well let me know when he the FBI is being investigated then. Then I would inform you that a criminal investigation was not the only form of investigation- that the House Intel Committee was doing an investigation- and that there was an IG and he was going to be doing an investigation and there would be consequences. Now we are just talking about what has been investigated so far, and what will be investigated further as a result. That's fine. If you need to progress in small steps, that's okay. We are here to help.
Oh, and my post asking whether there was a mole in the trump campaign was- as we know characterized as "tin foil" by you- it was tin foil to even ask, even though I did not say there was in the question. Now we have progressed beyond whether it was tin foil, to fighting over whether a clandestine, undercover surveillance from the outside is actually a spy or an informant. Fine, quite a lot of debate for something that was tin foil and not even enough substance to consider. I sure hope that 400 page plus page report by Horowitz and the 100,000 plus emails still to be released by senior FBI staffers continue to confirm your allegation that it was just a conspiracy theory on my part to question misconduct by the FBI. SO FAR NOT LOOKING GOOD. Just ask Andy.
MORE TO COME.
Last edited:
O lawdy, have all the predictions you want. As I said to jem, a prediction is not a conspiracy theory. A conspiracy theory is pushing nonsense about Hillary Clinton and a uranium deal with the Russians.
I think some of you predictions are off base and more hopeful than anything for IG report. For example McCabe sitting on emails hoping to get passed the election.
Now, Trey Gowdy has already said the informant was not targeting the Trump campaign or Trump himself. So your mole theory is debunked.
Seriously? On what planet does that pass for "logic"?
Not at all surprised given the colossal ignorance of other nonsense you've posted. For instance:
I stand by that 100%. He sat on huma/wiener emails for over a month right before the election until they became known. 100%. The public and the IG can form their own opinion as to why he did not review the emails received a month before the election- keeping in mind that -even facts and motive aside- all Justice Department employees are required to conduct themselves beyond even the appearance of impropriety. If the IG dings McCabe on that then I am sure you will move from arguing that, yes, maybe he did that but did but for reasons other than slow-walking anything that could hurt Hillary. We know how your crabwalk works.
Anyway. Not going to go back and forth on it at this stage. I say the IG will ding him on it. You say I am out to lunch. Fine. Let the games begin. Maybe this is your chance to be right about something and I am happy to help you with that because we know it has been a while.
I have also conceded that my statement that the IG will have some kind of issue or negative finding related to the DOJ's handling of the aftermath of the Tarmac Meeting is a little shaky because most of the swamp has moved past that and treating it as just an accidental fuck-up. But guess what. I stand by that too. My reading of Horowitz is that he would see that as an unforgiveable Banana Republic move and will not let it pass. So there. There's another chance for you to be right.
Keep in mind also, that as I have said, my expectations are not what I think the total picture is by far. Just some things that I think will be included. After all, he is the guy with the 400 plus person staff who have been doing an investigation for over a year. There should be dozens of other issues that I dont even know about in there.
We are on different wavelengths. I am just sharing what my views are. And you are desperately looking to be right about something. I am sure that when the IG's report comes out your first reaction will be to see if I was wrong about something, whereas for others, myself included it will be to see who took a hit and then assess what the implications are and next steps. In other words the issues.
Okay, dont bother me with this again until after the IG's report comes out, and don't bother me after either if it is with some contorted crabwalk bullshit. Let the viewers decide.
Have a nice day.