So - the answer to "Will Putin Invade Ukraine"

in the 90's Ukraine was loaded with nuclear, then in Budapest treaty the top dogs like: usa, uk, china france and RUSSIA fuckers, "Assured security" in exchange of disarmament.

It was stupid from Ukraine to give a inch of trust to this bunch of fuckers.
 
1) NATO's frontline is stopped at Ukraine, not at Poland's, Hungary's, Czech's border
2) for Ukraine, they'd need to fight the long war like Afghanistan did (9 years) (CIA support was one of the reasons for their success).
 
cesfx said:
in the 90's Ukraine was loaded with nuclear, then in Budapest treaty the top dogs like: usa, uk, china france and RUSSIA fuckers, "Assured security" in exchange of disarmament.

It was stupid from Ukraine to give a inch of trust to this bunch of fuckers.
More...

Ukraine didn't have the launch codes for the nuclear weapons, so they wouldn't have been able to use them as a deterrent against invasion. So, they weren't giving up as much as one would think.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum_on_Security_Assurances
Ukraine had the world's third-largest nuclear weapons stockpile,[2][3] of which Ukraine had physical, but not operational, control. Russia alone controlled the codes needed to operate the nuclear weapons[4][5] via Russian-controlled electronic Permissive Action Links and the Russian command and control system.[4][5]
More...
 
This video is from 2015. But this guy predicts exactly whats going to happen to Ukraine (its going to get wrecked), long video but i have cued it to the end bit where he predicts what is going to happen and how to avoid it.

 
In a ideal world Putin would be held accountable .
The reality is they're the second biggest nuclear state and US direct involvement would be disastrous for the whole world
 
Jungletrader said:
In a ideal world Putin would be held accountable .
The reality is they're the second biggest nuclear state and US direct involvement would be disastrous for the whole world
More...
Second? I think they are first in stockpile
 
Jungletrader said:
US direct involvement would be disastrous for the whole world
More...
If Putin doesn't back down, it seems inevitable. Because anything less will be an invitation for Putin to flex his expansionary intentions even more. Where, then, does it end? Yeah, it's one hell of a conundrum.
 
Frederick Foresight said:
If Putin doesn't back down, it seems inevitable. Because anything less will be an invitation for Putin to flex his expansionary intentions even more. Where, then, does it end? Yeah, it's one hell of a conundrum.
More...
You are way too optimistic about the cojones availability in Western politicians.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top