Your thinking is a wonderful anachronism. Had you been expressing these views in the early 1980s you'd have an enthusiastic following. Today, however, as the pendulum, having completed its period of left swing and right swing and returned close to equilibrium, is about to begin its left swing again. I estimate the period of our U.S. political pendulum at approximately 80-100 years. Your extreme right views that align so very well with the extreme right swing of the pendulum are approximately 40-50 years out of step. (it has taken about about 20-25 years to go from near equilibrium to the extreme right and another 20-25 to return to near the equilibrium point, we are now about to embark on a swing to the left. Expect a similar 50 year journey back to near equilibrium, if history is any guide.Now that we have "won the day" with regard to this "man made global warming" debate. It is my hope that we can move on to more important subjects like tax cuts, balanced budgets, privatized social security accts, healthcare competition, strong defense, necessary border wall etc.
I don't have extreme right views.Your thinking is a wonderful anachronism. Had you been expressing these views in the early 1980s you'd have an enthusiastic following. Today however, as the pendulum, having completed its period of left swing and right swing and returned close to equilibrium, is about to begin its left swing again. I estimate the period of our U.S. political pendulum at approximately 100 years. Your extreme right views that align well with the extreme right swing of the pendulum are approximately 50 years out of step. (it has taken about about 25 years to go from near equilibrium to the extreme right and another 25 to return to near the equilibrium point, we are now about to embark on a swing to the left. Expect a similar 50 year journey, if history is any guide.
No, of course not.I don't have extreme right views.

My views are mainstream American traditional constitutional views. They are not far right. They are normal views.No, of course not.![]()
Hey piehole, jerm, you guys know about this....??
In fact, as has been well documented, the industry spent decades pushing misleading and deceptive science and advertisements to claim nicotine wasn’t addictive, and that there wasn’t a risk of cancer from smoking cigarettes or from being exposed to second-hand smoke. This is despite the industry knowing its products caused cancer since the 1950s.
The tobacco industry’s tactics became known as the “tobacco playbook” — a strategy best captured in one industry memo from 1969 that has become infamous for stating, “Doubt is our product.”
“Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the ‘body of fact’ that exists in the mind of the general product. It is also the means of establishing a controversy,” the memo reads.
If this strategy sounds familiar, it’s because the fossil fuel industry put it into use a couple decades later.
As investigations by InsideClimate News and the Los Angeles Times revealed in 2015, ExxonMobil knew for decades about the damaging impact of burning fossil fuels — specifically, that its product would cause greenhouse gas emissions to rise and with it, global temperatures.
In fact, according to documents uncovered by DeSmogBlog, the oil giant knew as far back as the late 1970s that “there is no doubt” increasing the use of fossil fuels would increase carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
At the same time, Exxon, along with other fossil fuel giants like Koch Industries and Peabody Energy, have spent millions of dollars in their efforts to promote climate science denial to the general public and to policymakers.
https://thinkprogress.org/big-tobacco-climate-change-history-b1f88057f2cd/
Who won the day? There are scientists fighting it out on this issue and you think with your logic that couldn't fill a sperm that you won the day. I guess since it is cold outside you won the argument. Let's pick up the argument in 7 months then.
Scientist are still disagreeing but the geniuses here at ET got it nailed.
Who really thinks they won the day?
Most of the people bringing up the cold are just returning the trolls from people like Futurecurrents and Dem leaders.
Most thinking people realize there is the science is non conclusive so you we can't really Know. I believe until there is some proof we should be spending some of the agw money on cleaning oceans and creating fresh water.