so is it really true, that...

Quote from gerry875:

... there were protests in america, because of this cover?:

bab.jpg


(read this here in an austrian newspaper - they told that it was the first time ever that one of the bigger parents-magazines dared to put a naked breast on the cover).

so - pictures about the war (even dead bodies maybe) - anywhere - anytime - ok?

BUT - a picture of the MOST NATURAL THING of nature - NO WAY???

how sick can you be?

I appologize in advance, but how can we know for sure that that's even a TIT?
(looks like a baby rimjob to me..)
 
Quote from gerry875:

... there were protests in america, because of this cover?:

bab.jpg


(read this here in an austrian newspaper - they told that it was the first time ever that one of the bigger parents-magazines dared to put a naked breast on the cover).

so - pictures about the war (even dead bodies maybe) - anywhere - anytime - ok?

BUT - a picture of the MOST NATURAL THING of nature - NO WAY???

how sick can you be?
it's pathetic and i wouldn't be surprised at all. it stems from religious bs ..like sins, adam & eve..and all that shit. these are the lingering effects of it.
 
agree. that titty might not be a titty after all.

America is sick and perverted...:(




Quote from TM_Direct:

Im not sick...but that's one nice tit.....I can tell you right now, thats not a nursing mom...they don't look that good...trust me on this one:eek:
 
Quote from jzlucas:

2 women didn't like the cover - this translates into "protests in America" from an overseas newspaper???

as i wrote - 5,000 people answered and one quarter of them were disgusted somehow - so i think you get the idea.

whatever ...
 
That wasn't a "natural act" but gratuitous exhibitionism in a sexual context at Prime Time - tho I would give her breast a respectable 8- in the dark category.

Quote from DannoXYZ:

Look at what happened after the Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction...
 
Back
Top