Quote from StLouisTrader:
Sam,
Do you even have the slighest comprehension about warren buffett or his strategy with forex? your post would suggest you don't. For starters, you seem to somehow miss the point that his position is unlevered. If you're unfamiliar with this concept, it means when he says he has a "position" of 21 billion, it means he really does. If his 7 currencies go to zero, he only loses 21 billion, not one trillion..... Unlike you, he isn't using leverage. I hope none of the people who are following your thread are fooled into the notion that you have any idea what you're talking about, b/c this post of your surely illustrates that you don't.
I want to get one thing perfectly clear.
Go to Forbes 400 and you will see the top 10 richest people and what they do listed thusly:
Gates, Computer Software.
Buffett, Trader/Investor.
Allen, Microsoft.
Waltons, Retail (numbers 4 thru 8).
Dell, Computers
Ellison, Storage Software.
Just because Tiger Woods is a great golfer and earns millions, or a great baseball player earns $10s of millions, an executive of a big company earns $10s of millions...
What does that have to do with forex?
The forex market is a free market. It doesn't just give you money because your name is Bill or Warren or Larry or Tiger or Freddy.
Are we clear on this?
Entering, we are ALL equal in the global forex market. You could lose your money to me. I could lose my money to YOU.
Those are the real risks.
I trade in the forex and I post here.
Is Warren's money or Bill's money better than mine?
Why don't they post here? Are they too good to post here? Or maybe they don't want to look like a dufus because they are getting wiped out in the open forex market.
By trading in the currency market, if I am on the other side of his trade I'll rip Bill Gates' heart out (money-wise) and feed it to him on a rusty platter, I don't care WHO he is
outside the market.
I know certain
inner market realities that he does not know.
He can lose to me slowly or lose to me quickly, but if he enters
this arena he will lose. With or without use of margin. That goes for Buffett too.
In the market money is neutral. It knows
no owner until the trade is closed in a profit or in loss.
In that regard their money is no different than mine.
The number of units they have may be greater (temporarily) than what I expose to the forex but it all stops there.
Just because a person is a doctor or a lawyer or a successful entrepreneur, or is a software mogul or an investor extraordinaire doesn't matter in a market where TRILLIONS of dollars swirl around daily, ALL being up for grabs while in transition.
Yes, those trillions may make the number of my units insignificant but they also make Warren's and Bill's
insignificant too.
Embedded within bigger money is bigger stupidity. In forex you can extract the money by being less stupid.
Therefore, while they may live in a bigger house than me and drive a better car, in the forex...
none of that matters.
Just because they are good at an unrelated endeavor doesn't automatically mean they are good forex traders.
In fact, being good in an unrelated business doesn't make them or anyone "forex traders" at all.
Who designed Bill Gates' forex trading system? Did he?
I know who designed Windows but a forex trading system(s) that wins more than it loses is not based on computer programming languages.
Trading in the forex is very risky!
That much I know.
Consequently, unless their trading, trading style, trading methods, trading tactics, trading temperament or trading system are superior to mine they will lose to me.
And if I win it is because my system is superior to theirs. The number of units they commit to their positions doesn't matter to me.
If Gates is in EUR/USD I can scalp him for a
thousand points in a single 8 to 12 hour trading session when that pair typically moves 75 points. And end flat when I am done.
That's just the way it is. That's market reality.
The Coin