Six Months to Go Until The Largest Tax Hikes in History

[Thermactor]

Quote from Tom B:

Six Months to Go Until The Largest Tax Hikes in History
From Ryan Ellis on Thursday, July 1, 2010 4:15 PM


The “Special Needs Kids Tax” This provision of Obamacare imposes a cap on flexible spending accounts (FSAs) of $2500 (Currently, there is no federal government limit). There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children. There are thousands of families with special needs children in the United States, and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education. Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington, D.C. (National Child Research Center) can easily exceed $14,000 per year. Under tax rules, FSA dollars can be used to pay for this type of special needs education.

http://www.atr.org/six-months-untilbr-largest-tax-hikes-a5171#

Not my problem, and I'll be damned if they try to make it my problem any more than they already have.

 

[HomoSalmon]

Quote from Red_Ink_inc:

what did the Democrats do in 2004?

They ran John Kerry, a guy with zero charisma who resembled your alcoholic shop teacher from grade 9. Let's not forget his running mate who later turned out to have the moral compass of Tiger Woods.

It seems the Republicans learned nothing from their 2004 victory as in 2008 they ran a nearly 72 year old 3 time cancer survivor and a retarded Barbie Doll as his running mate. It's no wonder a guy named Barack Hussien Obama got the job.

Republicans can be as pissed off as they want at the 'liberals' who put Barry in power. The sad truth is they're to blame for Barry being in power.

The 2008 election was a lay up for Democrats. You had a deeply unpopular sitting president. Bush was seen as such a fuck up by 2008 that the electorate had no problem giving the keys to the bus to a guy with barely any driving record. Just because you've had no accidents doesn't mean you're qualified to drive in the Indianapolis 500.

So who did Republicans run? John McSame and a political Paris Hilton. There was no one else to vote for.

So what's the point of this post? Quit bitching about Barry and find a viable candidate who can take him on who has a chance of winning.

If the Republicans think their conservative electorate will back a guy who's birthname is Piyush Amrit Jindal, they're dreaming. So quit bitching and find someone who can beat Barry.

Interesting view. I Couldn't avoid notice that describing elections in this way make a point about an "invisible design" staging the outcome to its purpose... maybe road to serfdom?
To going against the wind needs a careful tacking, didn't they?

 

[Scataphagos]

Quote from Red_Ink_inc:

"...
If the Republicans think their conservative electorate will back a guy who's birthname is Piyush Amrit Jindal, they're dreaming. So quit bitching and find someone who can beat Barry.

If the Republicans ran Elmer Fudd vs. Obama, he should be voted out for his desire to "destroy America in the name of Social Justice". (Euphemism for Marxism, Communism, Statism in general.)

 

[jprad]

Quote from ..........:

116 promises kept,19 broken.

Yeah, this one's really going to change America's economic destiny:

No. 502: Get his daughters a puppy
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/promise/502/get-his-daughters-a-puppy/

This is but one example of the spin this "fact-checking" site puts on in favor of Obama:

Obama works to add one more space shuttle flight
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/promise/332/add-another-space-shuttle-flight/

In reality, the last scheduled shuttle mission, STS-134, was signed into law by Bush in 2008. Yet, these putzes are giving Obama credit for "adding" a flight by not removing the funding to lauch it.